Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40186251›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of medical research2025

Artificial intelligence (AI) approaches to male infertility in IVF: a mapping review.

Kowsar Qaderi, Foruzan Sharifipour, Mahsa Dabir, Roshanak Shams, Ali Behmanesh

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kowsar QaderiMidwifery Department, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Foruzan SharifipourMidwifery Department, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Mahsa DabirDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, School of Paramedical, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Roshanak ShamsBone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Baharestan Square, Mojahedin-e-Islam St, Tehran, 3713111576, Iran. shams.rosha.86@gmail.com.
Ali BehmaneshBone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Baharestan Square, Mojahedin-e-Islam St, Tehran, 3713111576, Iran. aa.behmanesh@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMale infertility contributes to 20-30% of infertility cases, yet traditional diagnostic and treatment methods face limitations in accuracy and consistency. Artificial intelligence (AI) promises to transform male infertility management within in vitro fertilization (IVF) by enhancing precision and efficiency.

objectiveThis study aims to map current AI applications in male infertility, evaluate their performance in IVF contexts, identify gaps in research, and propose strategies for clinical adoption.

methodsWe conducted a mapping review of 14 studies, sourced from PubMed, Scopus, IEEE, and Web of Science up to 2024. Using PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched titles and abstracts with keywords like "IVF," "AI," and "sperm analysis." Two authors independently screened records, extracted data on AI techniques, sample sizes, and outcomes, and categorized applications through content analysis, resolving discrepancies via consensus.

resultsAI employs tools like support vector machines (SVM), multi-layer perceptrons (MLP), and deep neural networks across six key areas. These include sperm morphology (e.g., SVM with AUC 88.59% on 1400 sperm), motility (e.g., SVM with 89.9% accuracy on 2817 sperm), and non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) sperm retrieval (e.g., gradient boosting trees [GBT] with AUC 0.807 and 91% sensitivity on 119 patients). AI also predicts IVF success (e.g., random forests with AUC 84.23% on 486 patients) and assesses sperm DNA fragmentation. Research surged since 2021, with 8 of 14 studies (57%) published between 2021 and 2023, reflecting growing interest..

conclusionsAI enhances diagnostic accuracy and treatment outcomes in male infertility. Future steps include multicenter validation trials, AI-driven sperm selection for IVF/ICSI, and standardized methods to ensure clinical reliability. Addressing ethical concerns like data privacy will further enable AI to improve IVF success globally.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceFertilization in VitroInfertility, MaleHumansMaleArtificial intelligence (AI)IVFMale infertilitySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40186251
PMCPMC11971770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.