SynthesisBMC health services research2025
Enhancing digital readiness and capability in healthcare: a systematic review of interventions, barriers, and facilitators.
Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
83 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence in Undergraduate Health Professions Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.JMIR medical education · 2026Pooled it
- Digital technologies and clinical decision support tools available for diabetes triage in the inpatient setting: A systematic literature review.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2026Pooled it
- Digital compassion fatigue and digital empathy in healthcare: mapping the evidence and informing a human-centered clinical framework.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Pooled it
- How do domain diversity and healthcare system assumptions shape implementation research? A systematic review of theories, models, and frameworks for health digitalization.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Pooled it
- A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies on cardiovascular disease patients' experiences using digital health tools.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- The effect of artificial intelligence-based scenarios on the clinical education of rehabilitation students: an anatomy-based randomized controlled study.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Remote training of behavioral intervention facilitators: model development and lessons learned.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Trial
- Co-Designing a Prototype Education and Training Intervention for Healthcare Professionals Working in Community Laryngectomy Care: An Experience-Based Co-Design Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Chronic pain and mobile health: Are the apps that occupational therapists recommend of high quality?Australian occupational therapy journal · 2026Article
- Nurses' Engagement in Digital Health Clinical Trials Using Unobtrusive Monitoring Technologies: Constructivist Grounded Theory Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Embedding digital health education into pre-registration health degrees: a pilot evaluation of a train-the-trainer toolkit.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Factors Associated With Nurses' Self-Reported Susceptibility to Online Health Misinformation: Evidence From Greece.International nursing review · 2026Observational
- Multisite Implementation of a Digital Wound Model of Care: A Post-Implementation Multimethods Evaluation of Patient and Clinician Perspectives and Lessons Learned.International wound journal · 2026Article
- Determinants of Behavioral Intention to Use Digital Healthcare Services: A Cross-Sectional PLS-SEM Study on the Shukhee App in Bangladesh.Health science reports · 2026Article
- An Evaluation of Clinician and Informatician Perspectives on Medication Harm Risk Prediction Tools for Use in a Tertiary Hospital Setting.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in psychiatric care and education: a qualitative study of factors influencing adoption in Singapore.International journal of medical education · 2026Article
- Digital health technologies for supporting home-based rehabilitation and management of children with cerebral palsy: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Profiling Healthcare Professionals' Digital Health Competence and Associated Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Nursing-Led Interventions for Preventing Falls in Hospitalized Patients: A Systematic Literature Review.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Review
- Determining the Organizational Culture and Readiness for Evidence-Based Practice Amongst Surgical Ward Nurses in Namibia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe rapid integration of digital technologies in healthcare requires healthcare professionals to be digitally ready and capable. This systematic review aims to identify interventions that improve digital readiness and capability among health professionals and to understand the barriers and facilitators they encounter during this digital transformation. METHODOLOGY: A mixed-methods systematic review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines. We searched five databases CINAHL Plus, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, and Web of Science. The review used the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) framework to investigate factors influencing technology adoption. Studies were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, focusing on health professionals' digital capability in healthcare settings. Quality assessment was performed using the MMAT checklist, and data were analysed and synthesized to extract relevant themes and sub-themes.
resultsInitially, 1140 studies were identified, with 21 meeting the inclusion criteria after screening. These studies, published between 2017 and 2023.The results were categorized into four main themes: Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, Facilitating Conditions, and Social Influence, with two sub-themes. The studies indicated that technology positively impacts job performance, facilitating acceptance among healthcare professionals. Ease of use was crucial for technology acceptance, while complexity and multiple logins were significant barriers. The importance of sufficient training and organizational support was highlighted to enhance digital competency and address technical issues, with inadequate training and infrastructure being major barriers. Social influence, including motivation of healthcare workers and shared decision-making, played a significant role in technology acceptance.
conclusionThis review highlights critical factors influencing the digital readiness and capability of healthcare professionals. Interventions enhancing performance expectancy, addressing effort expectancy, improving facilitating conditions, and leveraging social influence are essential for successful digital health adoption. Future research should develop comprehensive frameworks to overcome barriers and promote digital health readiness. Integrating specialized training into educational programs is crucial for preparing healthcare professionals to navigate the evolving digital landscape.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.