ArticleBMC women's health2025
Informational needs related to menstrual literacy among Dutch women: a focus group study.
Article in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gender equity and menstrual justice: a psychosocial review on stigma and discrimination in access to reproductive health.Reproductive health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMenstruation remains a taboo topic that is rarely discussed openly, even though nearly half of the world's population experiences it. Studies have shown that women wish to have more information about menstrual care worldwide. It is therefore crucial to break the taboo and support women in their quest for information. This study aims to investigate informational needs related to menstruation among Dutch women, in order to improve menstrual literacy.
methodsA qualitative exploratory design with focus group discussions was used. Participants were recruited at the gynaecology outpatient clinic of Máxima MC and through social media posts. A total of 24 Dutch women (aged between 20 and 62 years), who currently menstruate or have menstruated, participated in three focus group discussions. A thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.
resultsParticipants indicated that schools or family members had not provided them with sufficient information about menstruation prior to their menarche. This lack of information resulted in shame, taboos, and bullying. Furthermore, difficulties in communicating about menstrual complaints with friends, family and medical professionals were reported, resulting in a lack of information about which complaints are normal and when to seek help. Participants suggested creating an easily accessible online platform, categorized according to life stage (for example, menarche, midlife, towards menopause).
conclusionsThis qualitative study shows that Dutch women perceive information regarding menstruation as inadequate. It is recommended to re-evaluate menstrual education in school and combining information in one practical, patient-oriented website. For clinicians, it is important to realize menstrual knowledge of patients may be minimal and thus to support their patients in accessing reliable sources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.