ArticleBMC nursing2025
Evaluation of the effectiveness of rehabilitation nursing training for clinical nurses based on the Kirkpatrick model.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nurse core competency cultivation using the checklist-based Kirkpatrick model under the "cross-departmental bed-sharing" mode.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Peer-assisted learning combined with problem-based learning enhances clinical reasoning and knowledge application among medical students.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Prevention of bronchopulmonary aspiration in digestive surgery: the impact of training healthcare professionals.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccording to the "National Nursing Development Plan (2021-2025)" issued by the National Health Commission of China, it was crucial to address the limited research available on rehabilitation nursing training. By 2025, it was expected that at least 90% of urgently needed professional nurses, including rehabilitation nursing, would participate in training. Therefore, it was necessary to explore the effects of rehabilitation nursing training for clinical nurses and provide reference suggestions for rehabilitation nursing training.
methodsThe Kirkpatrick model was used as an evaluation tool to conduct a questionnaire survey of 79 clinical nurses who participated in the 5th term of rehabilitation nursing training in Shandong Province. Paired t tests, factor analysis, and qualitative interviews were used to analyze the participants' responses, learning styles, behaviors, and results. Four levels were used to evaluate training effectiveness.
resultsThe overall satisfaction rate of the trainees was high. There were significant differences in theoretical scores, operational examination scores and related nursing abilities before and after training; these scores before training were significantly lower than scores after training (P < 0.05). Four themes were extracted from the semi structured interviews: improving relevant capabilities, optimizing training, improving safety management awareness and crisis awareness, and expanding career development space.
conclusionsRehabilitation nursing training significantly improved the rehabilitation skills and knowledge of clinical nurses. Therefore, it was recommended that the methods and programs used in this study be adopted for the rehabilitation nursing training of clinical nurses in all specialty areas of nursing to improve their nursing skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.