ArticleBMC nursing2025
Cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the Rushton Moral Resilience Scale (RMRS).
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Rushton Moral Resilience Scale-16™ in Nurses.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Translation and psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the nurse team resilience scale in the context of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.BMC nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNurses frequently encounter complex ethical dilemmas and high-stress environments. Moral resilience, characterized by the ability to navigate these challenges with confidence and integrity, is essential for optimal patient care and personal well-being.
aimThis study aimed to culturally adapt and validate the Persian version of the Rushton Moral Resilience Scale (RMRS) among Iranian nurses.
methodThis methodological study employed a convenience sample of 659 nurses working in clinical wards of public and private hospitals in Kermanshah City, Iran. The RMRS was translated into Persian using the forward-backward translation method proposed by Polit and Yang. To assess the psychometric properties of the Persian RMRS, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and reliability were conducted.
resultsExploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported the factor structure of the Persian RMRS, identifying four factors comprising 15 items, which accounted for 50.98% of the total variance. The CFA model exhibited good fit indices: χ²/df = 2.35, RMSEA = 0.061, NNFI/TLI = 0.91, CFI = 0.94, GFI = 0.94, and SRMR = 0.049. The scale demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency, with a Macdonald Omega coefficient of 0.728 and an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of 0.715 (95% CI: 0.677-0.749).
conclusionThe present study successfully adapted and validated the Persian version of the Rushton Moral Resilience Scale (RMRS) for Iranian nurses. The scale demonstrated sound psychometric properties, including acceptable reliability and validity. These findings suggest that the Persian RMRS can be a valuable tool for researchers and healthcare professionals to assess moral resilience among Iranian nurses, enabling a deeper understanding of this construct and its implications for patient care and well-being. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.