ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Predicting placenta accreta spectrum and high postpartum hemorrhage risk using radiomics from T2-weighted MRI.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- MDIFN: a deep learning-based multi-dimensional interaction fusion network for placental MRI segmentation.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- The quintessential high-risk profile: advanced management strategies for placenta accreta spectrum in patients with advanced maternal age and IVF conception.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and predictive analytics in obstetric anesthesia: early warning for maternal complications.Current opinion in anaesthesiology · 2026Review
- Ultrasound texture-based radiomics of placental and myometrial tissue for predicting postpartum blood loss in women with placenta previa and low-lying placenta.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAntenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is of critical importance, considering that women have much better outcomes when delivery occurs at a level III or IV maternal care facility before labor initiation or bleeding, thus avoiding placental disruption. Herein, we aimed to investigate the performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in antenatal prediction of PAS and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH).
methodsThis retrospective study included 433 women with singleton pregnancies (PAS group, n = 208; non-PAS group, n = 225; PPH-positive (PPH (+)) group, n = 80; PPH-negative (PPH (-)) group, n = 353), who were randomly divided into a training set and a test set in a 7:3 ratio. Radiomic features were extracted from T2WI (T2-weighted imaging). Features strongly correlated with PAS and PPH (p < 0.05) were selected using Pearson correlation, followed by LASSO regression for dimensionality reduction. Subsequently, radiomics models were constructed for PAS and PPH risk prediction, respectively. Regression analyses were conducted using radiomics score (R-score) and clinical factors to identify independent clinical risk factors for PAS and PPH, leading to the development of corresponding clinical models. Next, clinical-radiomics models were built by combining R-score and clinical risk factors. The predictive performance of the models was evaluated using nomograms, calibration curves, and decision curves.
resultsThe clinical-radiomics models and radiomics models for predicting PAS and PPH risk both outperformed their clinical models in the training and testing sets. For PAS, the AUC (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve) of the clinical-radiomics model, radiomics model, and clinical model in the training set are 0.918, 0.908, and 0.755, respectively, and in the testing set, the AUCs are 0.885, 0.866, and 0.771, respectively. For PPH, the AUCs of the clinical-radiomics model, radiomics model, and clinical model in the training set are 0.918, 0.884, and 0.723, respectively, and in the testing set, the AUCs are 0.905, 0.860, and 0.688, respectively. The DeLong test p-values between the clinical-radiomics models and radiomics models for predicting PAS and PPH are both less than 0.05. Additionally, in the testing set, the clinical-radiomics models perform best in predicting PAS and PPH risk, with accuracies of 82.31% and 84.61%, respectively.
conclusionThis novel clinical-radiomics model has a robust performance in predicting PAS antepartum and predicting massive PPH in pregnancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.