Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40186134›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2025

From 'support' to 'separate': residential aged care staff responses to an intimate relationship involving a resident with cognitive impairment.

Linda McAuliffe, Deirdre Fetherstonhaugh, Maggie Syme

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Linda McAuliffeAustralian Centre for Evidence Based Aged Care (ACEBAC), La Trobe University Melbourne Campus, Victoria, 3086, Australia. l.mcauliffe@latrobe.edu.au.
Deirdre FetherstonhaughAustralian Centre for Evidence Based Aged Care (ACEBAC), La Trobe University Melbourne Campus, Victoria, 3086, Australia.
Maggie SymeHebrew SeniorLife/Harvard Medical School, Marcus Institute for Aging, Roslindale, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntimate relationships are important throughout life but can be complicated in later years if a person develops cognitive impairment and moves into residential aged care. The aim of this research was to elucidate the ways in which residential aged care staff would intervene in an intimate relationship between residents when a resident has cognitive impairment, and their motivations for intervening.

methodsThis was an exploratory study. Vignette methodology was employed depicting a hypothetical case of a relationship between two residents (one who has cognitive impairment). A national postal survey was sent to all residential aged care facilities in Australia. Thematic analysis was performed on responses (N = 515) to open-ended questions regarding how staff would intervene and motivations for doing so.

resultsThematic analysis identified six key themes emerging from the data related to staff responses: communicating; educating; respecting; monitoring; distracting; and separating. Each of these themes is illustrated by participant quotes. Participants largely did not report motivations for responding in the ways identified.

conclusionsThere is considerable variability in residential aged care staff responses to an intimate relationship between residents when one resident has cognitive impairment. Intimate relationships between residents can be supported or prevented as a result.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCognitive DysfunctionHomes for the AgedInterpersonal RelationsNursing HomesProfessional-Patient RelationsAdultAgedAustraliaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesCognitive impairmentDecision-makingDementiaIntimacyNursing homesSexuality

Identifiers

PMID40186134
PMCPMC11969714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.