ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2025
Artificial neural networks applied to somatosensory evoked potentials for migraine classification.
Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- 'Man vs. Machine: can ML algorithms diagnose headaches as accurately as clinicians? A systematic review.'Journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- State-dependent facial pulsation asymmetry and phase asynchrony measured by imaging photoplethysmography and their coupling with contingent negative variation in migraine.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFinding a biomarker to diagnose migraine remains a significant challenge in the headache field. Migraine patients exhibit dynamic and recurrent alterations in the brainstem-thalamo-cortical loop, including reduced thalamocortical activity and abnormal habituation during the interictal phase. Although these insights into migraine pathophysiology have been valuable, they are not currently used in clinical practice. This study aims to evaluate the potential of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) in distinguishing migraine patients from healthy individuals using neurophysiological recordings.
methodsWe recorded Somatosensory Evoked Potentials (SSEPs) to gather electrophysiological data from low- and high-frequency signal bands in 177 participants, comprising 91 migraine patients (MO) during their interictal period and 86 healthy volunteers (HV). Eleven neurophysiological variables were analyzed, and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Forward Feature Selection (FFS) techniques were independently employed to identify relevant variables, refine the feature space, and enhance model interpretability. The ANNs were then trained independently with the features derived from the PCA and FFS to delineate the relationship between electrophysiological inputs and the diagnostic outcome.
resultsBoth models demonstrated robust performance, achieving over 68% in all the performance metrics (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 scores). The classification model trained with FFS-derived features performed better than the model trained with PCA results in distinguishing patients with MO from HV. The model trained with FFS-derived features achieved a median accuracy of 72.8% and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79, while the model trained with PCA results showed a median accuracy of 68.9% and an AUC of 0.75.
conclusionOur findings suggest that ANNs trained with SSEP-derived variables hold promise as a noninvasive tool for migraine classification, offering potential for clinical application and deeper insights into migraine diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.