Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40186010›Full record

ArticleBiogerontology2025

Evaluating transcriptional alterations associated with ageing and developing age prediction models based on the human blood transcriptome.

Ivan Duran, Amy Tsurumi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biogerontology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ivan DuranDepartment of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 50 Blossom St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Amy TsurumiDepartment of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 50 Blossom St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA. atsurumi@mgh.harvard.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ageing-related DNA methylome and proteome changes and machine-learned ageing clock models have been described previously; however, there is a dearth of ageing clock prediction models based on human blood transcript information. Applying various machine learning algorithms is expected to aid in the development of age prediction models. Using blood transcriptome data from healthy subjects ranging in age from 21 to 90 in the 10 K Immunomes repository, we evaluated differentially regulated transcripts, assessed enriched gene ontology, pathway and disease ontology analysis to characterize biological functions associated with the genes associated with age. Furthermore, we constructed and compared age prediction models developed by applying the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), Elastic Net (EN), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Light Gradient-Boosting Machine (LightGBM) algorithms. Compared to LASSO (7 genes) and EN (9 genes) regularized regression, XGBoost (142 genes) and LightGBM (149 genes) Gradient Boosted Decision Tree methods performed better in this dataset (training set r = 0.836 (LASSO), 0.837 (EN), 1.000 (XGBoost) and 0.995 (LightGBM); test set: r = 0.883 (LASSO), 0.876 (EN), 0.931 (XGBoost) and 0.915 (LightGBM); external validation set: r = 0.535 (LASSO), 0.534 (EN), 0.591 (XGBoost) and 0.645 (LightGBM)). Blood transcriptome-based age prediction models may provide a simple method to monitor biological ageing, and provide additional molecular insight. Future studies to externally validate these models in various diverse large populations and molecular studies to elucidate the underlying mechanisms by which the gene expression levels may be related to ageing phenotypes would be advantageous.

Indexed as

AgingTranscriptomeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultAgeingAgingBiomarkerMachine learningPrediction modelTranscriptome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.