ArticleScientific reports2025
Tunnel face rock mass class rapid identification based on TBM cutterhead vibration monitoring and deep learning model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Thermodynamically consistent modeling of granular soils using physics-informed neural networks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid identification of the rock mass condition at the tunnel face is a key problem for TBM operating parameters optimization and subsequent tunnel support measures selection. The vibration induced by the rock breaking contains essential information for evaluating the tunnel face condition. However, conventional vibration-based methods face difficulties in continuously obtaining vibration records for long tunnel sections. Additionally, there's a lack of TBM cutterhead vibration monitoring, and they heavily depend on expertise and prior knowledge. In this study, an end-to-end deep learning (DL) method was developed for rock mass class identification of TBM tunnel working faces based on the measurement of TBM cutterhead vibration signals, including cutterhead vibration signal measurement, signal preprocessing, model training and optimization, and application verification. The model combines the advantages of 1DCNN, BiLSTM, and self-attention mechanisms, where the structural innovation of 1DCNN inspired by Inception v2 for multi-scale feature extraction. Which can automatically extract the spatial and temporal domain features in the signals to promptly identify the rock mass class at the working face without stopping the normal tunneling process. The accuracy on the test set is 95.89% compared to 85.34% for a traditional ML model, and it has better performance than other DL model architectures. The model underwent validation during subsequent TBM tunneling within the same project, successfully proving its practical reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.