Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40185972›Full record

ArticleRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Imaging of the lymphatic vascular system-techniques].

A Henkel, Claus C Pieper

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A HenkelSektion für minimal invasive Lymphgefäßtherapie, Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland.
Claus C PieperSektion für minimal invasive Lymphgefäßtherapie, Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland. claus_christian.pieper@ukbonn.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical/methodical issueImaging of the lymphatic vascular system is comparatively difficult and logistically demanding. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL

methodsThe field has developed significantly in recent decades. The longest established techniques are conventional X‑ray lymphangiography and lymphoscintigraphy. METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS: In recent years, magnetic resonance (MR) and computed tomography (CT) lymphangiography have been developed using different contrast medium (CM) techniques. For interstitial lymphangiography, CM is injected intracutaneously, and absorbed and drained by the lymphatic system. For direct techniques, CM is injected directly into a lymph node or a prepared lymph vessel. PERFORMANCE: Lymphangiography procedures offer high anatomical and/or temporal resolution that have method-related differences. They allow better morphological assessment of the lymph vessels compared to lymphoscintigraphy. Furthermore, MR and CT lymphangiography are less invasive than conventional x‑ray lymphangiography. EVALUATION: MR lymphangiography in particular allows dynamic assessment of lymph flow through repetitive imaging, which is particularly valuable in complex situations. While MR lymphangiography is now established in centers despite the off-label use of CM, data regarding CT lymphangiography is still very limited. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: A number of specific lymphatic imaging techniques are available at specialized centers.

Indexed as

Lymphatic DiseasesLymphatic VesselsLymphographyMagnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedContrast MediaHumansLymphoscintigraphyContrast MediaComputed tomography lymphangiographyDiagnosticsDynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance lymphangiographyLymphatic systemX‑ray lymphangiography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.