Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40185965›Full record

ReviewAIDS and behavior2025

A Rapid Review of HIV-Related Stigma-Reduction Randomized Controlled Trials.

Paul C J Berthe, Yanis Ben Amor

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in AIDS and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Paul C J BertheGraduate School of Journalism (CJS), Columbia University, NYC, USA. pb2828@columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-1599-2953
Yanis Ben AmorCenter for Sustainable Development (CSD), Columbia University, NYC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a rapid review to identify and describe randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed at reducing HIV-related stigma. Using a rapid review design in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, we searched five major databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, OVID/Medline, EMBASE, and Scopus) from July 1981 to June 2023, and analyzed 27 studies from an initial pool of 2,383 articles. Our analysis revealed three primary intervention strategies: (1) alleviating internalized stigma through confidence-building and emotional validation, (2) addressing anticipated and enacted stigma via training and sensitization campaigns, and (3) challenging institutional and cultural beliefs through macro-scale interventions. Community-driven approaches and locally-engaged interventions demonstrated particular promise, especially in resource-constrained settings. While intrapersonal and interpersonal approaches-particularly those involving professional discussions, peer education, and in-person training-showed the most positive outcomes, digital and infotainment interventions yielded mixed results. Our findings highlight the complexity of HIV-related stigma, revealing the importance of holistic strategies that address intersecting psychosocial factors and potential unintended consequences of stigma-reduction efforts. By studying the nuanced landscape of stigma intervention, this review provides insights for developing more comprehensive and contextually sensitive approaches to reducing HIV-related stigma.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsSocial StigmaHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.