Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40185941›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Development and validation of a clinical prognosis prediction model for malignant intestinal obstruction: A retrospective cohort study.

Hao Duan, Ran Tao, Jun Qin

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hao Duan *Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, No. 20 Xisi Road, 226000, Nantong, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Ran Tao *Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, No. 20 Xisi Road, 226000, Nantong, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Jun QinAffiliated Hospital of Nantong University, No. 20 Xisi Road, 226000, Nantong, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China. junqinnt@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is a common and complex condition in clinical practice, which seriously affects the quality of life and prognosis of patients. However, the current lack of effective prognostic models for MBO has greatly limited clinical precision treatment and patient management. Focusing on this issue, this study aims to construct and validate a prognostic model for the overall survival (OS) of MBO patients, providing crucial support for clinical decision - making and improving the prognosis of patients. In this study, 41 items of real - world data from 192 patients in the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University from January 2022 to January 2024 were collected, including 39 independent variables, survival time, and survival status. Subsequently, the patients were randomly divided into groups at a ratio of 7:3. Predictor variables were screened using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) and multivariate Cox regression, and then a Cox model was constructed. The model was validated using the Concordance index (C - index), time - dependent Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA). Finally, a nomogram of the model was created. The study found that significant risk factors affecting patient mortality included chemoradiotherapy (β = - 1.24; HR = 0.29;95%CI, 0.14-0.59), conservative treatment (β = 1.34; HR = 3.81; 95%CI, 1.69-8.55), new cases (β = - 0.96; HR = 0.38; 95%CI, 0.19-0.77), AJCC T stage 4 (β = 2.16; HR = 8.64; 95%CI, 1.47-50.76), red blood cell count (RBC, β = - 0.63; HR = 0.53; ; 95%CI, 0.38-0.80), prothrombin time (PT, β = 0.37; HR = 1.45; ; 95%CI, 1.07-1.97), aspartate aminotransferase (AST, β = 0.01; HR = 1.01; 95%CI, 1.00-1.02), and intestinal necrosis (β = 1.73; HR = 5.62; 95%CI, 1.11-28.27). In the development set, the AUC and C - index values of the prognostic models for 30 - day, 90 - day, and 180 - day are 0.87, 0.94, and 0.92 respectively. In the validation set, the corresponding values are 0.83, 0.96, and 0.89. The results of DCA analysis indicated that the model was reliable and could effectively predict the 30 - day, 90 - day, and 180 - day survival periods of MBO patients. This study successfully constructed and validated a prognostic model for the overall survival of MBO patients. This model identified multiple key prognostic factors and exhibited good predictive performance. It provides important reference for clinicians to predict the survival period of MBO patients and develop personalized treatment plans, and is expected to improve the clinical outcomes of MBO patients.

Indexed as

Intestinal ObstructionAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNomogramsPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsROC CurveLasso regressionMalignant bowel obstructionMalignant tumorNomogramPrediction modelPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID40185941
PMCPMC11971399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.