Trial reportScientific reports2025
Blended nutrition education with real-life scenarios enhances learning and nutritional counseling capabilities in nursing students.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluated the efficacy of a blended teaching model integrating real-life scenarios into nutrition education for nursing students. The study adhered to the CONSORT guidelines. Participants (N = 283) were cluster-randomized into two groups: a blended teaching group (n = 76) receiving self-management activities via WeChat Moments alongside teachers, and a traditional teaching group (n = 207) receiving teacher-based instruction. A battery of survey items was meticulously analyzed, including demographics, educational quality, self-directed learning ability, and the willingness to further study in the nutrition course. Additionally, chapter test scores, final examination grades, nutritional counseling capabilities, and final course grades were evaluate. Blended teaching significantly improved the chapter test average (P = 0.018), willingness to continue learning (P = 0.018), students' evaluation of teaching quality (P = 0.027), and nutritional counseling capabilities (P < 0.001); however, no differences were observed in final exam grades (P = 0.620) or final course grades (P = 0.951). Our research findings clearly show that combining blended teaching with real-life scenarios significantly benefits educational quality. It boosts students' willingness to keep learning, their evaluation of teaching quality, and their self-directed learning awareness, and also favorably impacts the development of their nutritional counseling capabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.