ArticleScientific reports2025
Safety assessment of proteasome inhibitors real world adverse event analysis from the FAERS database.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of E3 Ubiquitin Ligases Associated with Survival in Soft Tissue Sarcomas.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Synergistic Molecular Strategies for Targeting the Unfolded Protein Response in Cancer Therapy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Protein Post-Translational Modifications in the Regulation of Ferroptosis: New Opportunities and Challenges for Cancer Immunotherapy.International journal of biological sciences · 2026Review
- Ixazomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Hungarian Real-World Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proteasome inhibitor analogs (PIs) have significantly improved the degree of remission and survival rate of patients with multiple myeloma. However, serious adverse events (AEs) have hindered their clinical application. This study analyzed the AEs reported in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to determine the safety profile and differences for the PI drugs bortezomib, carfilzomib, and ixazomib. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was used to detect safety signals. Significant safety signals were detected based on system-organ classification (SOC). For bortezomib, the most significant SOC signal was "blood and lymphatic system disorders" (ROR = 3.47, 95% CI 3.37-3.57), while the most significant PT signal was "enteric neuropathy" (ROR = 134.96, 95% CI 45.67-398.79). For carfilzomib, the most significant SOC signal being "blood and lymphatic system disorders" (ROR = 4.34, 95% CI 4.17-4.53), while the most significant PT signal was "light chain analysis increased" (ROR = 76.65, 95% CI 57.07-102.96). For ixazomib, the most significant SOC signal was "gastrointestinal disorders" (ROR = 2.04, 95% CI 1.96-2.12), while the most significant PT signal was "light chain analysis increased" (ROR = 67.15, 95% CI 45.36-99.42). For bortezomib and carfilzomib, the top 20 reported PTs were consistent with AEs listed in the drug information. For ixazomib, six unexpected AEs were observed: asthenia, malaise, pyrexia, decreased appetite, dehydration, and falls. The PIs were consistent with the early failure model based on time-series analysis of the occurrence of adverse reactions to the drug. The data mined from FAERS generates new AE signals, and further clinical studies are needed to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.