Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40185849›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Gut microbiota diversity among humans, elephants, livestock and wild herbivores in Chitwan National Park bears implications for conservation medicine.

Rajesh Man Rajbhandari, Giovanni Forcina, Prajwol Manandhar, Pragun G Rajbhandari, Rajindra Napit, Roji Raut, Seily Shrestha, Amir Sadaula, Christian Gortázar, Paulo Célio Alves and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Rajesh Man Rajbhandari *Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Giovanni Forcina *CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, Vairão, Portugal.
Prajwol ManandharCenter for Molecular Dynamics Nepal, Swaraj Sadhan, Thapathali 11, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Pragun G RajbhandariCenter for Molecular Dynamics Nepal, Swaraj Sadhan, Thapathali 11, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Rajindra NapitCenter for Molecular Dynamics Nepal, Swaraj Sadhan, Thapathali 11, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Roji RautCenter for Molecular Dynamics Nepal, Swaraj Sadhan, Thapathali 11, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Seily ShresthaCenter for Molecular Dynamics Nepal, Swaraj Sadhan, Thapathali 11, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Amir SadaulaBiodiversity Conservation Center, National Trust for Nature Conservation, Sauraha, Chitwan, Nepal.
Christian GortázarInstitute for Game and Wildlife Research, IREC (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM), SaBio Research Group, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Paulo Célio AlvesDepartamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
José de la FuenteInstitute for Game and Wildlife Research, IREC (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM), SaBio Research Group, Ciudad Real, Spain.
João QueirósDepartamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Dibesh KarmacharyaCenter for Molecular Dynamics Nepal, Swaraj Sadhan, Thapathali 11, Kathmandu, Nepal. dibesh@cmdn.org.

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia PTDC/BAA-360 AGR/28866/2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gut microbiome influences host health and well-being. Co-occurring hosts may exchange disease-causing bacteria belonging to these microbial communities. Therefore, monitoring gut microbiota composition in wildlife and humans is paramount to prevent zoonotic diseases, thus protecting and strengthening public health. We characterized diversity and abundance of the gut microbiome bacterial component across mahouts (captive elephant trainers and handlers), their pachyderms, livestock and wild herbivores in and around Chitwan National Park (Nepal). Firmicutes and Bacteroidota were invariably the dominant phyla. In humans, the relative abundance of Firmicutes was higher, the alpha diversity lower and beta diversity different compared to other host categories. Livestock and wild herbivores displayed similar alpha and beta diversity due to the presence of Proteobacteria, Actinobacteriota and Verrucomicrobiota. Elephants had a higher alpha diversity, and a significant beta diversity compared to other mammals. Our results suggest that taxonomic affiliation and diet niche are the main drivers of gut microbiota composition. Nevertheless, Mycobacterium and other potentially pathogenic bacteria genera were detected in elephants and livestock other than wild herbivores. These findings shed light on microbiota sharing and interlinking in each environment, thereby highlighting the importance of conservation medicine to better our understanding of health in co-occurring host species.

Indexed as

ElephantsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHerbivoryLivestockAnimalsAnimals, WildBacteriaBiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesHumansParks, RecreationalRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBacterial functionHuman–wildlife–livestock–environment interfaceMicrobiomeNepalOne HealthZoonosis

Identifiers

PMID40185849
PMCPMC11971256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.