ArticleScientific reports2025
A muscle synergy-based method to improve robot-assisted movements.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of early intervention with upper limb rehabilitation robots in upper limb functional reconstruction and improving sarcopenia-related indicators in stroke patients.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Reconstructing hand gestures with synergies extracted from dance movements.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is increasing interest in using assistive robotic devices to support motor re-learning and recovery in individuals with neurological impairments. These robots aim to enhance overall motor control by providing adaptive assistance. However, using muscle synergies in designing control strategies for rehabilitation devices remains an emerging area of research. This study proposes a novel synergy-based objective function to assess how changes in robotic assistance levels affect muscle synergies in a 2D reaching task in the horizontal plane. Healthy participants performed the task in a transparent mode and with three levels of assistance while holding a weight. EMG signals from seven muscles were decomposed into muscle synergies across all conditions. First, we defined the three reference synergies as baseline knowledge of the synergies required to execute the task and their modulation, resulting in three main muscle recruitment strategies across ten participants. We then introduce three metrics to assess variations in motor coordination relative to the reference synergies. These metrics assessed how closely participants' muscle activation patterns matched the reference synergies, capturing variations in the shape, timing, and overall similarity of the muscle activation profiles. Finally, by combining the metrics, we present an objective function that assesses participants' motor coordination when performing the task with the added weight. The results highlight the importance of personalized assistance, as not all individuals could closely match the reference synergies with the same level of assistance. Additionally, the objective function demonstrated statistically significant differences in performance across assistance levels. Although this is a preliminary study, it presents promising results as a first step towards implementing human-in-the loop optimization in robotic-assisted rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.