ArticleScientific reports2025
Metagenomic evaluation, antimicrobial activities, and immune stimulation of probiotics from dietary supplements and dairy products.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- In Vitro Gastrointestinal Stability and Functional Evaluation of Yogurt Fortified With Paraprobiotics and Postbiotics.Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
- Characterization and Validation of the Antibacterial Activity ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The gut reservoir of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales: from dysbiosis and colonization to infection and decolonization, with a focus on patients with hematologic malignancies - a narrative review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Pasture diversity and regenerative management shape ruminant gut microbiome dynamics within a real multi-year farming system.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Estrogenic Effect of Probiotics on Anxiety and Depression: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- The potential of the microbiome as a target for prevention and treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Probiotics are widely marketed as dietary supplements and dairy products for their purported antimicrobial and immunomodulatory activities, often with limited supporting evidence. We identified and isolated probiotics from commercial dietary supplements and dairy products using metagenomics and cultured-based methods. We assessed their anti-bacterial activity against diverse pathogens and investigated their immunomodulatory effects on phagocytes and natural killer (NK) cells. Metagenomic analysis revealed that Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium were the predominant genera in dietary supplements, while Streptococcus spp. was dominated in dairy products. However, only 37% of the predominant microorganisms identified by metagenomics were accurately listed on product labels. Among 70 representative probiotic strains, 4.3-17.1% probiotic strains demonstrated strong antibacterial-effects against pathogenic bacteria. Notably, specific strains of Bifidobacterium longum and Lactobacillus plantarum exhibited strong antagonistic activity against extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing and carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli. Some strains of Lactobacillus spp. significantly enhanced phagocytic activity in monocytes and increased IFN-γ production in NK cells, while members of Lactobacillus rhamnosus significantly suppressed TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-8 production in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated macrophages. In contrast, Bifidobacterium animalis stimulated the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines. This study highlights discrepancies in probiotic labeling and demonstrates the antimicrobial and immunomodulatory potential of specific probiotic strains, suggesting their utility in enhancing health and wellness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.