ArticleScientific reports2025
Wind power prediction using stacking and transfer learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As countries focus more on renewable energy, especially wind power, predicting wind power output accurately is crucial for managing power grids and saving costs. This paper presents a new method for ultra-short-term wind power prediction using a combination of Stacking and Transfer Learning. To improve accuracy, we first reduce the data dimensions using PCA. Then, we use several models like LSTM, BiLSTM, GRU, BiGRU, and LSTM-Attention as base learners. These models are combined using a Stacking ensemble model. We also use Transfer Learning to share trained models between tasks, which helps improve performance. Tests with real data from a wind farm show that our method is more accurate than single models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.