Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40185820›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Linked survey and statutory health insurance data evaluating healthcare utilization patterns and associated factors of persons with diabetes in Germany - latent class analysis.

Ute Linnenkamp, Inga Deininghaus, Veronika Gontscharuk, Silke Andrich, Manuela Brüne, Nadezda Chernyak, Johannes Kruse, Mickaël Hiligsmann, Barbara Hoffmann, Andrea Icks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ute Linnenkamp *Institute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düssseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. Ute.Linnenkamp@ddz.de.
Inga Deininghaus *Institute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Auf'm Hennekamp 65, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Veronika GontscharukInstitute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düssseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Silke AndrichInstitute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düssseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Manuela BrüneInstitute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düssseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Nadezda ChernyakInstitute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düssseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Johannes KruseClinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Clinics Gießen and Marburg, Friedrichstraße 33, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Mickaël HiligsmannDepartment of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Barbara HoffmannInstitute for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Gurlittstr. 55/II, 40223, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Andrea IcksInstitute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düssseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Persons with diabetes mellitus have complex healthcare needs. Existing disease management programmes (DMPs) are based on a one-size-fits-all approach. However, individuals might require more individualised care. This study aims to identify groups with different patterns of healthcare utilization among people with diabetes in Germany and factors associated with these different patterns. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among a random sample from a statutory health insurance (SHI) with diabetes (n = 1332) and linked to longitudinal SHI data. Latent class analysis was used to identify subgroups with similar patterns of healthcare utilization and factors associated with different patterns. Four patterns of healthcare utilization were identified among people with diabetes: 'low users' (20.8% of the total sample); 'low users with ophthalmologist visit' (45.2%); 'high users' (26.5%); and 'high users with mental health care' (7.5%). The classes differed significantly in age, sex, type, duration and severity of diabetes, DMP membership, diabetes training, health-related quality of life, and prevalence of depression. The 'high users with mental health care' class was for example younger, more female, had a lower quality of life and the highest prevalence of depression. This study may provide a first basis for thinking about targeted care in Germany beyond DMPs.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusInsurance, HealthPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansLatent Class AnalysisMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40185820
PMCPMC11971297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.