Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40185813›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Deep learning prediction of mammographic breast density using screening data.

Chen Chen, Enyu Wang, Vicky Yang Wang, Xiayi Chen, Bojian Feng, Ruxuan Yan, Lingying Zhu, Dong Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chen Chen *Taizhou Key Laboratory of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy & Artificial Intelligence, Taizhou Branch of Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (Taizhou Cancer Hospital), Taizhou, 317502, Zhejiang, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9181-8462
Enyu Wang *Taizhou Key Laboratory of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy & Artificial Intelligence, Taizhou Branch of Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (Taizhou Cancer Hospital), Taizhou, 317502, Zhejiang, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0895-3132
Vicky Yang WangTaizhou Key Laboratory of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy & Artificial Intelligence, Taizhou Branch of Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (Taizhou Cancer Hospital), Taizhou, 317502, Zhejiang, China.
Xiayi ChenTaizhou Key Laboratory of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy & Artificial Intelligence, Taizhou Branch of Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (Taizhou Cancer Hospital), Taizhou, 317502, Zhejiang, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4559-0775
Bojian FengTaizhou Key Laboratory of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy & Artificial Intelligence, Taizhou Branch of Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (Taizhou Cancer Hospital), Taizhou, 317502, Zhejiang, China.
Ruxuan YanTaizhou Key Laboratory of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy & Artificial Intelligence, Taizhou Branch of Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (Taizhou Cancer Hospital), Taizhou, 317502, Zhejiang, China.
Lingying ZhuTaizhou Key Laboratory of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy & Artificial Intelligence, Taizhou Branch of Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (Taizhou Cancer Hospital), Taizhou, 317502, Zhejiang, China. whitemouse811@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0583-240X
Dong XuTaizhou Key Laboratory of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy & Artificial Intelligence, Taizhou Branch of Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (Taizhou Cancer Hospital), Taizhou, 317502, Zhejiang, China. xudong@zjcc.org.cn.

Funding

"Pioneer" and "Leading Goose" R&D Program of Zhejiang 2023C04039Research Program of National Health Commission Capacity Building and Continuing Education Center CSJRZC2021JJSJ001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated a series of deep learning (DL) models for the objective assessment of four categories of mammographic breast density (e.g., fatty, scattered, heterogeneously dense, and extremely dense). A retrospective analysis was conducted using data collected from Taizhou Cancer Hospital over a period from January 2015 to December 2020. The dataset included mammograms from 9,621 women, totaling 57,282 images. The dataset was divided into training, validation, and test sets at a ratio of 7:2:1. Four DL models were employed, with Average Precision (AP) served as the primary evaluation metric. Additionally, the diagnostic performance of the DL models was compared with that of radiologists. Finally, we conducted validation of our model using an external test set. Among the DL models studied, InceptionV3 performed best, with AP values of 0.895 for almost entirely fatty, 0.857 for scattered fibroglandular tissue, 0.953 for heterogeneously dense, and 0.952 for extremely dense categories. The InceptionV3 model outperformed radiologists in accuracy and consistency. While radiologists surpassed the InceptionV3 model in fatty and scattered categories, their accuracy dropped significantly in heterogeneously and extremely dense categories. Nevertheless, our study demonstrated that DL can serve as a valuate tool in assisting radiologists with the objective quantification of breast density.

Indexed as

BreastBreast DensityBreast NeoplasmsDeep LearningMammographyAdultAgedEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRetrospective StudiesAutomated breast density quantificationBreast cancer riskDeep learningMammography

Identifiers

PMID40185813
PMCPMC11971370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.