ArticleScientific reports2025
Cold aortic flush after ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest reduces inflammatory reaction but not neuronal loss in the pig cerebral cortex.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hypothermia after Cardiac Arrest in Large Animals (HACA-LA): a randomized controlled experimental study.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to retrospectively compare two resuscitation methods (extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) vs. emergency preservation and resuscitation (EPR)) by pathohistologically assessing pig brains in a ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest (VFCA) model. In prospective studies from 2004 to 2006, swine underwent VFCA for 13 (n = 6), 15 (n = 14) or 17 (n = 6) minutes with ECPR (ECPR13, ECPR15 and ECPR17). Another 15 min VFCA group (n = 8) was resuscitated with EPR and chest compressions (EPR15 + CC). Brains of animals surviving for nine days (ECPR13 n = 4, ECPR15 n = 2, ECPR17 n = 1, EPR15 + CC n = 7) were harvested. Eight different brain regions were analyzed with the image analysis software QuPath using HE-staining, GFAP- and Iba1-immunohistochemistry. Only ECPR13 and EPR15 + CC animals were included in statistical analysis, due to low survival rates in the other groups. All VFCA samples showed significantly fewer viable neurons compared to shams, but no significant differences between ECPR13 and EPR15 + CC animals were observed. ECPR13 animals showed significantly more glial activation in all cerebral cortex regions compared to shams and in occipital, temporal and parietal cortex compared to EPR15 + CC. In conclusion, EPR + CC resulted in a significantly reduced inflammatory reaction in cerebral cortex compared to ECPR but did not influence the extent of neuronal death after VFCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.