ArticleScientific reports2025
Assessment of family planning service utilization and associated factors among female students at Assosa university, Ethiopia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transitions between contraceptive states among women aged 15-49 Years in Guinea.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Family planning is vital for reproductive health, enabling individuals to space children and plan their family size. Despite its importance, many women, especially students, don't use family planning services. In Ethiopia, where the total fertility rate is 4.6 children per woman and 22% of women have an unmet need for family planning, this study assesses the use of family planning services among female students at Assosa University in Northwest Ethiopia. An institutional-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 351 female students at Assosa University from March to May 2023. Participants were randomly selected using stratified sampling. Data on demographics, family planning knowledge, attitude, and practice were collected through a pre-tested online questionnaire via Google Docs. The questionnaire, adapted from existing scales, was pilot-tested among 10% of the students before the main survey. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 26, employing descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and logistic regression. Results were reported as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals, with a p-value of less than 0.05 considered statistically significant. Of the 345 female students surveyed, 98.3% participated. Most were young (18-20), single Christians with positive views on family planning. About 57.1% used family planning services, and religious reasons (75.4%) were the primary reason for non-use. Factors influencing service use included awareness of contraceptive benefits (AOR = 0.005, 95% CI: 0.000-0.460), prior use (AOR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.124-0.781), side effects from discontinuation (AOR = 0.221, 95% CI: 0.101-0.487), and future intention (AOR = 4.812, 95% CI: 1.528-15.15). The study emphasizes that enhancing and promoting family planning services for female students at Assosa University is vital for overcoming socio-cultural and religious barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.