ArticleScientific reports2025
A comparative analysis of three risk assessment scales for predicting venous thromboembolism in traumatic brain injury patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Caprini score for venous thromboembolism risk assessment: A scoping review of applications, validation, and future directions.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2026Article
- VTE risk assessment in trauma patients: a comparative analysis of Caprini, Trauma Embolic Scoring System, and Greenfield Risk Assessment profile models in a single sample.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study aimed to assess the predictive ability of the Caprini score, Risk Assessment Profile for Thromboembolism (RAPT), and Trauma Embolic Scoring System(TESS) for VTE risk assessments in TBI patients. A retrospective analysis of 460 TBI patients was conducted, categorizing them into VTE and non-VTE groups based on imaging results. The three scales were applied to assess VTE risk, and their performance was compared using receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curves and area under the curve(AUC) values. The VTE incidence was 31.7%. The RAPT scale demonstrated the highest AUC (0.826) and optimal cutoff (9.5) with balanced sensitivity (0.753) and specificity (0.771). The Caprini and TESS scales also showed moderate to high predictive value but had lower AUCs. All three scoring scales showed medium to high predictive value for the risk of VTE in patients with TBI. Among them, the RAPT scoring scale offered the highest predictive value for VTE risk in TBI patients, with fewer items, making it easier for clinical implementation. It stands as the most appropriate VTE risk assessment scale for TBI patients at present.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.