SynthesisScientific reports2025
Diagnostic accuracy of nanopore sequencing for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis and drug-resistant strains: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid drug resistance prediction in positiveEmerging microbes & infections · 2026Article
- Gemifloxacin resistance inMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Nanopore Sequencing in Mycobacterial Diagnostics: Clinical and Laboratory Roles of mNGS and tNGS.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Application of FreezeTB, a targeted nanopore sequencing assay, for identification of drug resistance and lineages among pulmonary tuberculosis cases in Alaska.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Clinical application of chest CT image screening combined with nanopore targeted sequencing in improving the diagnosis rate of pulmonary tuberculosis patients.Frontiers in public health · 2026Observational
- Alarming levels of fluoroquinolone resistance among MDR-TB patients in Poland: molecular and phenotypic analysis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Clinical utility of targeted next-generation sequencing for rapid detection, species differentiation, drug resistance profiling, and prognostic evaluation inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- The transformative impact of ultra-rapid nanopore sequencing in precision medicine.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Fluoroquinolone resistance and mutation profiles inFrontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Genome graphs reveal the importance of structural variation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis evolution and drug resistance.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Tuberculosis Today: Microbial Insights, Epidemiological Trends, and the Role of Molecular Diagnostics.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Next generation sequencing as a panacea for antibiotic susceptibility testing: yea or nay?Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Drug resistance profile ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- A Case Report of RefractoryInfection and drug resistance · 2025Article
- Beyond H37Rv:Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB), caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) infection, remains a significant public health threat. The timeliness, portability, and capacity of nanopore sequencing for diagnostics can aid in early detection and drug susceptibility testing (DST), which is crucial for effective TB control. This study synthesized current evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of the nanopore sequencing technology in detecting MTB and its DST profile. A comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, Cochrane, EMBASE, Web of Science, AIM, IMEMR, IMSEAR, LILACS, WPRO, HERDIN Plus, MedRxiv, and BioRxiv was performed. Quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, predictive values (PV), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated. Thirty-two studies were included; 13 addressed MTB detection only, 15 focused on DST only, and 4 examined both MTB detection and DST. No study used Flongle or PromethION. Seven studies were eligible for meta-analysis on MTB detection and five for DST; studies for MTB detection used GridION only while those for DST profile used MinION only. Our results indicate that GridION device has high sensitivity [88.61%; 95% CI (83.81-92.12%)] and specificity [93.18%; 95% CI (85.32-96.98%)], high positive predictive value [94.71%; 95% CI (89.99-97.27%)], moderately high negative predictive value [84.33%; 95% CI (72.02-91.84%)], and excellent DOR [107.23; 95% CI (35.15-327.15)] and AUC (0.932) in detecting MTB. Based on DOR and AUC, the MinION excelled in detecting pyrazinamide and rifampicin resistance; however, it underperformed in detecting isoniazid and ethambutol resistance. Additional studies will be needed to provide more precise estimates for MinION's sensitivity in detecting drug-resistance, as well as DOR in detecting resistance to pyrazinamide, streptomycin, and ofloxacin. Studies on detecting resistance to bedaquiline, pretomanid, and linezolid are lacking. Subgroup analyses suggest that overall accuracy of MTB detection tends to be higher with prospective study design and use of standards other than CSTB (Chinese national standard for diagnosing TB). Sensitivity analyses reveal that retrospective study design, use of GridION, and use of Illumina whole-genome sequencing (WGS) decrease overall accuracy in detecting any drug-resistant MTB. Findings from both types of analyses, however, should be interpreted with caution because of the low number of studies and uneven distribution of studies in each subgroup.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.