ArticleScientific reports2025
Advancing plant leaf disease detection integrating machine learning and deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Curse of Black Sigatoka: A Backward Bifurcation Perspective.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2026Article
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Plant Disease Detection and Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Review of Deep Learning Approaches, Multimodal Sensing Technologies, and Future Perspectives in Precision Agriculture.The plant pathology journal · 2026Review
- Deep learning techniques for early detection and classification of leaf diseases in crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- OptiNet-B3: a lightweight explainable deep learning model for multiclass classification of fruit and leaf diseases.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Recent advances in plant disease detection: challenges and opportunities.Plant methods · 2025Review
- Detecting the Type and Severity of Mineral Nutrient Deficiency in Rice Plants Based on an Intelligent microRNA Biosensing Platform.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- SRC-YOLOv8n: a lightweight framework for fine-grained apple leaf disease detection with spatial detail preservation and multi-scale feature enhancement.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conventional techniques for identifying plant leaf diseases can be labor-intensive and complicated. This research uses artificial intelligence (AI) to propose an automated solution that improves plant disease detection accuracy to overcome the difficulty of the conventional methods. Our proposed method uses deep learning (DL) to extract features from photos of plant leaves and machine learning (ML) for further processing. To capture complex illness patterns, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) such as VGG19 and Inception v3 are utilized. Four distinct datasets-Banana Leaf, Custard Apple Leaf and Fruit, Fig Leaf, and Potato Leaf-were used in this investigation. The experimental results we received are as follows: for the Banana Leaf dataset, the combination of Inception v3 with SVM proved good with an Accuracy of 91.9%, Precision of 92.2%, Recall of 91.9%, F1 score of 91.6%, AUC of 99.6% and MCC of 90.4%, FFor the Custard Apple Leaf and Fruit dataset, the combination of VGG19 with kNN with an Accuracy of 99.1%, Precision of 99.1%, Recall of 99.1%, F1 score of 99.1%, AUC of 99.1%, and MCC of 99%, and for the Fig Leaf dataset with Accuracy of 86.5%, Precision of 86.5%, Recall of 86.5%, F1 score of 86.5%, AUC of 93.3%, and MCC of 72.2%. The Potato Leaf dataset displayed the best performance with Inception v3 + SVM by an Accuracy of 62.6%, Precision of 63%, Recall of 62.6%, F1 score of 62.1%, AUC of 89%, and MCC of 54.2%. Our findings explored the versatility of the amalgamation of ML and DL techniques while providing valuable references for practitioners seeking tailored solutions for specific plant diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.