ArticleNature communications2025
Ex vivo cortical circuits learn to predict and spontaneously replay temporal patterns.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emergence of Deviance Detection in Cortical Cultures Through Maturation, Criticality, and Early Experience.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- The phantastic organ: predictive processing in the brain.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- From chemistry to cognition: the adaptive origins of consciousness under constraint.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Can a single brain cell be surprised?Nature communications · 2025Article
- Deviance detection and regularity sensitivity in dissociated neuronal cultures.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It has been proposed that prediction and timing are computational primitives of neocortical microcircuits, specifically, that neural mechanisms are in place to allow neocortical circuits to autonomously learn the temporal structure of external stimuli and generate internal predictions. To test this hypothesis, we trained cortical organotypic slices on two temporal patterns using dual-optical stimulation. After 24-h of training, whole-cell recordings revealed network dynamics consistent with training-specific timed prediction. Unexpectedly, there was replay of the learned temporal structure during spontaneous activity. Furthermore, some neurons exhibited timed prediction errors as revealed by larger responses when the expected stimulus was omitted compared to when it was present. Mechanistically our results indicate that learning relied in part on asymmetric connectivity between distinct neuronal ensembles with temporally-ordered activation. These findings further suggest that local cortical microcircuits are intrinsically capable of learning temporal information and generating predictions, and that the learning rules underlying temporal learning and spontaneous replay can be intrinsic to local cortical microcircuits and not necessarily dependent on top-down interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.