ArticleJACC. Case reports2025
Remote Tamponade After Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure.
Article in JACC. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe use of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation at high thromboembolic risk and contraindication to or high risk for bleeding with oral anticoagulation is increasing. CASE SUMMARY: The authors present a case of acute hemorrhagic tamponade 7 months after LAAC. Intraoperative findings showed device-related microperforation of the LAA and erosion of the adjacent pulmonary artery. DISCUSSION: Remote tamponade after LAAC has been reported with an incidence <1%, occurring more frequently in nitinol plug devices than in nitinol cage devices. Management ranges from conservative with cessation of antithrombotic agents to invasive with surgical repair. TAKE-HOME MESSAGES: Remote tamponade after LAAC is a rare but potentially fatal complication. Routine use of cardiac computed tomography in addition to transesophageal echocardiography for preprocedural planning, especially for nitinol plug devices, can identify patients at risk of delayed tamponade and can guide device selection, modified implantation technique, or alternative management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.