ArticleJournal of clinical epidemiology2025
Comparing major comorbidity indices as predictors of all-cause mortality in the Veterans Affairs health care system.
Article in Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI), and the Functional Comorbidity Index (FCI) are validated clinical measures of comorbidity, but direct comparisons between these measures have rarely been studied especially in high-risk patient populations, such as homeless individuals. The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) offers large patient samples to compare these comorbidity measures as predictors of mortality using administrative and clinical records. We examined CCI, ECI, and FCI scores among veterans seeking VA healthcare services, including those experiencing homelessness, and compared their predictive value in relation to all-cause mortality risk. STUDY DESIGN AND
settingSeveral VA databases from 2017 to 2021 were retrospectively linked, and 4,701,711 U S. veterans [308,553 with homelessness and 4,393,158 without homelessness] were evaluated over a median follow-up of 4.1 years, yielding 917,921 recorded deaths. Regression models were constructed, and Harrell's Concordance Statistic (HCS) was calculated that assessed the ability of z-transformed comorbidity scores to discriminate "high-risk" vs "low-risk" groups of patients for mortality risk, after adjustment for demographic and clinical characteristics.
resultsIn adjusted models, ECI (HCS: 0.76-0.77) and CCI (HCS: 0.75-0.76) were better able to discriminate "high-risk" vs "low-risk" groups than FCI (HCS: 0.72-0.75) among homeless and nonhomeless veterans. Compared to ECI and CCI, FCI was more strongly associated with homelessness.
conclusionCCI and ECI may be more predictive of all-cause mortality risk than FCI, although FCI may be a useful measure of functioning in homeless populations. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: The CCI, ECI, and FCI are clinical measures of comorbidity, but their direct comparisons have been limited, especially in high-risk patient populations like homeless individuals. This study examined CCI, ECI, and FCI scores among veterans seeking health care services at the US Department of Veterans Affairs and found that ECI and CCI were better at discriminating high-risk vs low-risk groups and predicting mortality among homeless and nonhomeless veterans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.