ArticleClinical medicine (London, England)2025
The medical licensing assessment (MLA) content map: A list is not a syllabus, and a syllabus is not a curriculum.
Article in Clinical medicine (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The GMC's Medical Licensing Assessment (MLA) marks a pivotal moment in UK medical education: the 2025 graduating cohort will be the first required to pass this national exam before entering clinical practice. The accompanying MLA 'Content Map' lists 217 clinical presentations and 315 conditions - across 25 areas of clinical practice that students need to know by the end of the programmes. While some medical educators may simply use this list to confirm whether timetabled teaching covers the material required, others may use the list a driver for curriculum change and transformation. In the case of the latter, meaningful opportunity now exists for collaborative redesign of undergraduate programmes, comprising everything from removing terms such as 'pre-clinical' and 'clinical' through to promoting more integrated approaches to delivering medical education and developing clinical reasoning using more authentic, applied workplace-based learning activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.