Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40185207›Full record

GuidelineInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2025

American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria Systematic Review and Guidelines on Reirradiation for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Executive Summary.

Charles B Simone, Arya Amini, Indrin J Chetty, J Isabelle Choi, Stephen G Chun, Jessica Donington, Martin J Edelman, Kristin A Higgins, Larry L Kestin, Pranshu Mohindra and 8 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Re-irradiation in central lung cancer-a monocentric detailed analysis.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Modeling Time-Dependent Recovery to Improve Esophagitis Prediction in Thoracic Reirradiation.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Efficacy and safety of twice-daily accelerated hyperfractionated re-irradiation for thoracic malignancies.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Charles B SimoneNew York Proton Center, New York, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Electronic address: csimone@nyproton.com.
Arya AminiCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California.
Indrin J ChettyHenry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan.
J Isabelle ChoiNew York Proton Center, New York, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Stephen G ChunUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Jessica DoningtonThe University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Martin J EdelmanFox Chase Comprehensive Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Kristin A HigginsCity of Hope Cancer Center Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia.
Larry L KestinMichigan Healthcare Professionals Radiation Oncology Institute/GenesisCare, Farmington Hills, Michigan.
Pranshu MohindraUniversity Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
Benjamin MovsasHenry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan.
George B RodriguesLondon Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.
Kenneth E RosenzweigMount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York.
Igor I RybkinHenry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan.
Annemarie F ShepherdNew York Proton Center, New York, New York; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Ben J SlotmanAmsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Andrea WolfMount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York.
Joe Y ChangUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
A radiation oncology clinician scientist devoted to building an inclusive clinical research program in an integrated academic satellite network in service to the National Cancer InstituteR50CA275822 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Stephen G Chun · 2023 to 2026
$347k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R50 CA275822
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Definitive thoracic reirradiation can improve outcomes for select patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with locoregional recurrences. To date, there is a lack of systematic reviews on safety or efficacy of NSCLC reirradiation and dedicated guidelines. This American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria Systematic Review and Guidelines provide practical guidance on thoracic reirradiation safety and efficacy and recommends consensus of strategy, techniques, and composite dose constraints to minimize risks of high-grade/fatal toxicities. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses systematic review assessed all studies published through May 2020 evaluating toxicities, local control and/or survival for NSCLC thoracic reirradiation. Of 251 articles, 52 remained after exclusions (3 prospective) and formed the basis for recommendations on the role of concurrent chemotherapy, factors associated with toxicities, and optimal reirradiation modalities and dose-fractionation schemas. Stereotactic body radiation therapy improves conformality/dose escalation and is optimal for primary-alone failures, but caution is needed for central lesions. Concurrent chemotherapy with definitive reirradiation improves outcomes in nodal recurrences but adds toxicity and should be individualized. Hyperfractionated reirradiation may reduce long-term toxicities, although data are limited. Intensity modulated reirradiation is recommended over 3D conformal reirradiation. Particle therapy may further reduce toxicities and enable safer dose escalation. Acute esophagitis/pneumonitis and late pulmonary/cardiac/esophageal/brachial plexus toxicities are dose limiting for reirradiation. Recommended reirradiation composite dose constraints (2 Gy equivalents): esophagus V60 <40%, maximum point dose (Dmax) < 100 Gy; lung V20 <40%; heart V40 <50%; aorta/great vessels Dmax < 120 Gy; trachea/proximal bronchial tree Dmax < 110 Gy; spinal cord Dmax < 57 Gy; brachial plexus Dmax < 85 Gy. Personalized thoracic reirradiation approaches and consensus dose constraints for thoracic reirradiation are recommended and serve as the basis for ongoing Reirradiation Collaborative Group and NRG Oncology initiatives. As very few prospective and small retrospective studies formed the basis for generating the dose constraint recommended in this report, further prospective studies are needed to strengthen and improve these guidelines.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsRe-IrradiationHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRadiosurgeryRadiotherapy DosageSocieties, MedicalUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40185207
PMCPMC12874335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.