SynthesisBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Deep learning in single-cell and spatial transcriptomics data analysis: advances and challenges from a data science perspective.
Synthesis in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- The long-lived immune system of centenarians.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2026Review
- Spatially organized regulated cell death-immune coupling in solid tumors: integrating spatial omics with actionable regulated cell death biology.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- scDAU: a disentangled representation learning method for cross-modal translation in single-cell multi-omics data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Image-guided spatial omics enhancement reveals hidden spatial microstructures.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Computational analysis in spatial transcriptomics: methods and perspectives.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- The applications of single-cell and spatial transcriptomics in neuroscience and brain disorders.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2026Review
- Multiscale systems modelling of communication networks in brain metastasis.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Comparative review of artificial intelligence for transcriptomic biomarker discovery in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Review
- IST: an ontology-guided attention-based autoencoder for interpretable analysis of single-cell transcriptomic data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Single-Cell and Spatial Omics: Methods and Applications.MedComm · 2026Review
- The Evolution of Spatial Omics Technologies Introduces A Novel Avenue for Lung Cancer Research.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2026Review
- DDR2-COL11A1 Transcriptional Coupling as a Candidate Therapeutic Target in Colorectal Cancer: Integrative Transcriptomic and Deep Learning Validation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Spatial multi-omics integration by cross-modal graph contrastive learning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Targeting endoplasmic reticulum stress in diabetic retinopathy: mechanistic insights and emerging therapies.Biological research · 2026Review
- Advances in Spatial Transcriptomics in Bone.Current osteoporosis reports · 2026Review
- Computational approaches to multimodal data integration in rheumatoid arthritis: from data landscape to clinical translation.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Single-cell transcriptomic insights into the intrinsic cardiac nervous system: diversity, development, and neuro-cardiac interactions.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- Hybrid Feature Selection-Based Machine Learning and Deep Learning Framework for Biomarker Prediction From RNA-seq Data During Dengue Fever to Severe Dengue Progression.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Revolution in Transcriptomics: From Single Cells to Spatial Atlases.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of single-cell and spatial transcriptomics has revolutionized our capacity to investigate cellular properties, functions, and interactions in both cellular and spatial contexts. Despite this progress, the analysis of single-cell and spatial omics data remains challenging. First, single-cell sequencing data are high-dimensional and sparse, and are often contaminated by noise and uncertainty, obscuring the underlying biological signal. Second, these data often encompass multiple modalities, including gene expression, epigenetic modifications, metabolite levels, and spatial locations. Integrating these diverse data modalities is crucial for enhancing prediction accuracy and biological interpretability. Third, while the scale of single-cell sequencing has expanded to millions of cells, high-quality annotated datasets are still limited. Fourth, the complex correlations of biological tissues make it difficult to accurately reconstruct cellular states and spatial contexts. Traditional feature engineering approaches struggle with the complexity of biological networks, while deep learning, with its ability to handle high-dimensional data and automatically identify meaningful patterns, has shown great promise in overcoming these challenges. Besides systematically reviewing the strengths and weaknesses of advanced deep learning methods, we have curated 21 datasets from nine benchmarks to evaluate the performance of 58 computational methods. Our analysis reveals that model performance can vary significantly across different benchmark datasets and evaluation metrics, providing a useful perspective for selecting the most appropriate approach based on a specific application scenario. We highlight three key areas for future development, offering valuable insights into how deep learning can be effectively applied to transcriptomic data analysis in biological, medical, and clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.