Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40185158›Full record

SynthesisBriefings in bioinformatics2025

Deep learning in single-cell and spatial transcriptomics data analysis: advances and challenges from a data science perspective.

Shuang Ge, Shuqing Sun, Huan Xu, Qiang Cheng, Zhixiang Ren

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The long-lived immune system of centenarians.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Advances in Spatial Transcriptomics in Bone.Current osteoporosis reports · 2026
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Artificial Intelligence Revolution in Transcriptomics: From Single Cells to Spatial Atlases.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shuang GeShenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, 2279 Lishui Road, Nanshan District, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China.ORCID 0009-0003-3103-0157
Shuqing SunShenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, 2279 Lishui Road, Nanshan District, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China.
Huan XuSchool of Public Health, Anhui University of Science and Technology, 15 Fengxia Road, Changfeng County, Hefei 231131, Anhui, China.
Qiang ChengDepartment of Computer Science, University of Kentucky, 329 Rose Street, Lexington 40506, Kentucky, USA.
Zhixiang RenPengcheng Laboratory, 6001 Shahe West Road, Nanshan District, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China.

Funding

University of Kentucky Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP30AG072946 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI LINDA J VAN ELDIK · 2021 to 2026
$23.5M
Gene Profile Analysis of Associations between Alzheimer’s Disease and Circadian Rhythmic Patterns of Human Brain Regions Using Machine LearningR21AG070909 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI CHENG, QIANG · 2021 to 2021
$421k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072946NIA NIH HHS R21 AG070909
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of single-cell and spatial transcriptomics has revolutionized our capacity to investigate cellular properties, functions, and interactions in both cellular and spatial contexts. Despite this progress, the analysis of single-cell and spatial omics data remains challenging. First, single-cell sequencing data are high-dimensional and sparse, and are often contaminated by noise and uncertainty, obscuring the underlying biological signal. Second, these data often encompass multiple modalities, including gene expression, epigenetic modifications, metabolite levels, and spatial locations. Integrating these diverse data modalities is crucial for enhancing prediction accuracy and biological interpretability. Third, while the scale of single-cell sequencing has expanded to millions of cells, high-quality annotated datasets are still limited. Fourth, the complex correlations of biological tissues make it difficult to accurately reconstruct cellular states and spatial contexts. Traditional feature engineering approaches struggle with the complexity of biological networks, while deep learning, with its ability to handle high-dimensional data and automatically identify meaningful patterns, has shown great promise in overcoming these challenges. Besides systematically reviewing the strengths and weaknesses of advanced deep learning methods, we have curated 21 datasets from nine benchmarks to evaluate the performance of 58 computational methods. Our analysis reveals that model performance can vary significantly across different benchmark datasets and evaluation metrics, providing a useful perspective for selecting the most appropriate approach based on a specific application scenario. We highlight three key areas for future development, offering valuable insights into how deep learning can be effectively applied to transcriptomic data analysis in biological, medical, and clinical settings.

Indexed as

Data ScienceDeep LearningGene Expression ProfilingSingle-Cell AnalysisTranscriptomeComputational BiologyHumansdeep learningsingle-cellspatial transcriptomics

Identifiers

PMID40185158
PMCPMC11970898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.