Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40184686›Full record

ArticlePhysical therapy2025

Shared Decision-Making in Physical Therapist Care for People With Shoulder Problems: An Observer-Based Analysis of Audio-Recorded Consultations.

Sijmen Hacquebord, Henri Kiers, Philip van der Wees, Thomas J Hoogeboom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sijmen HacquebordUniversity of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Institute for Human Movement Studies, Heidelberglaan 7, Utrecht, CS 3584, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5634-5612
Henri KiersUniversity of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Institute for Human Movement Studies, Heidelberglaan 7, Utrecht, CS 3584, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9128-2108
Philip van der WeesIQ Health Science Department, Radboud University Medical Center, Kapittelweg 54, Nijmegen, EP 6525, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2881-5159
Thomas J HoogeboomIQ Health Science Department, Radboud University Medical Center, Kapittelweg 54, Nijmegen, EP 6525, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2103-419X

Funding

Dutch Research Council 023.018.059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDespite the substantial diagnostic and therapeutic uncertainties in the decision-making process, it remains largely unclear to what extent shared decision-making (SDM) is applied in physical therapist care for people with shoulder problems. The purpose of our study was to determine to what extent SDM is part of the decision-making process in initial physical therapist consultations of people with shoulder problems and to identify factors associated with the level of SDM.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study, the level of SDM was measured by assessing audio-recorded initial physical therapist consultations of people with shoulder problems using the 5-item Observing Patient Involvement in SDM tool (OPTION-5; 0-100, higher OPTION scores indicate higher level of SDM). Associations between the level of SDM and the characteristics of patients, physical therapists, and consultations were assessed using multilevel analysis.

resultsA total of 100 initial physical therapist consultations of 41 participating physical therapists were included. The mean OPTION-5 score was 27 (range = 5-70). On none of the individual items of the OPTION-5, the highest score "exemplar effort" was observed. The multilevel analysis showed that 3 determinants were associated with higher level of SDM: younger age of the patient (b = -1.8; 95% CI = -3.1 to -0.4), longer duration of the consultation (b = 5.5; 95% CI = 2.7 to 8.3), and higher level of education of the physical therapist (b = 9.1; 95% CI = 2.7 to 15.4).

conclusionsThe level of SDM in daily physical therapist practice for people with shoulder problems leaves room for improvement. Future research should focus on strategies to improve the application of SDM in physical therapist care for people with shoulder problems. The determinants such as duration of the consultation, and the level of education of the physical therapist might provide guidance in developing these strategies for improving the application of SDM. IMPACT: The findings of this study give insight into the limited application of SDM in physical therapy for people with shoulder problems. Duration of the consultations and level of education of the physical therapist impact the level of SDM.

Indexed as

Decision Making, SharedPatient ParticipationPhysical TherapistsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesShoulder PainAdultAgedAge FactorsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReferral and ConsultationEvidence-Based MedicinePhysical TherapyShared Decision-MakingShoulder

Identifiers

PMID40184686
PMCPMC12163903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.