ArticlePhysical therapy2025
Shared Decision-Making in Physical Therapist Care for People With Shoulder Problems: An Observer-Based Analysis of Audio-Recorded Consultations.
Article in Physical therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors Influencing Nurses' Intention and Behavior in Shared Decision-Making: A Cross-Sectional Study.The journal of nursing research : JNR · 2026Article
- Patient participation and its determinants based on the Social Ecological Model: a cross-sectional study in North China.BMC health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveDespite the substantial diagnostic and therapeutic uncertainties in the decision-making process, it remains largely unclear to what extent shared decision-making (SDM) is applied in physical therapist care for people with shoulder problems. The purpose of our study was to determine to what extent SDM is part of the decision-making process in initial physical therapist consultations of people with shoulder problems and to identify factors associated with the level of SDM.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, the level of SDM was measured by assessing audio-recorded initial physical therapist consultations of people with shoulder problems using the 5-item Observing Patient Involvement in SDM tool (OPTION-5; 0-100, higher OPTION scores indicate higher level of SDM). Associations between the level of SDM and the characteristics of patients, physical therapists, and consultations were assessed using multilevel analysis.
resultsA total of 100 initial physical therapist consultations of 41 participating physical therapists were included. The mean OPTION-5 score was 27 (range = 5-70). On none of the individual items of the OPTION-5, the highest score "exemplar effort" was observed. The multilevel analysis showed that 3 determinants were associated with higher level of SDM: younger age of the patient (b = -1.8; 95% CI = -3.1 to -0.4), longer duration of the consultation (b = 5.5; 95% CI = 2.7 to 8.3), and higher level of education of the physical therapist (b = 9.1; 95% CI = 2.7 to 15.4).
conclusionsThe level of SDM in daily physical therapist practice for people with shoulder problems leaves room for improvement. Future research should focus on strategies to improve the application of SDM in physical therapist care for people with shoulder problems. The determinants such as duration of the consultation, and the level of education of the physical therapist might provide guidance in developing these strategies for improving the application of SDM. IMPACT: The findings of this study give insight into the limited application of SDM in physical therapy for people with shoulder problems. Duration of the consultations and level of education of the physical therapist impact the level of SDM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.