ArticlePloS one2025
Telehealth intervention involving the HEARTS Technical Package and the additional use of an activity monitor to increase physical activity level post-stroke: Protocol for a feasibility randomized controlled trial.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06068036 (Telehealth Intervention Involving the HEARTS Technical Package and the Use of an Activity Monitor to Increase Physical Activity Level Post-stroke), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Telehealth Intervention Involving the HEARTS Technical Package and the Use of an Activity Monitor to Increase Physical Activity Level Post-stroke: a Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLow physical activity level is a common risk factor for recurrent stroke. Feasibility studies show behavior change interventions can increase physical activity participation, but face barriers (e.g., home visits or internet access). Low-cost telehealth approaches, like telephone calls, may overcome these challenges. Another low-cost strategy involves motivational tools supporting "Behavioral Regulation," such as physical activity monitors. However, evidence is insufficient to support their use in increasing physical activity levels post-stroke. A systematic review suggests integrating these devices into multifaceted behavior change interventions (e.g., the 5As brief intervention outlined in the HEARTS Technical Package) may enhance their effectiveness. Combined with physical activity monitors and telephone follow-up, this approach has proven feasible for individuals post-stroke. These findings underscore the need to explore combining the 5As brief intervention with physical activity monitors to assess potential added benefits. This feasibility randomized controlled trial (RCT) study will investigate whether the telehealth intervention (by telephone call) combining the 5As brief intervention, as outlined in the HEARTS Technical Package, and physical activity monitoring, compared to a control group receiving only the 5As brief intervention, is feasible and supports a fully powered RCT.
methodsA feasibility RCT study, with blinded assessment, will assign 24 individuals post-stroke (diagnosed ≥ 6 months), aged ≥ 18 years, inactive, able to walk 10 meters independently, and medically approved for physical activity, to experimental (n = 12) or control group (n = 12). Both groups will undergo the 5As brief intervention (Ask, Advise, Assess, and Assist delivered face-to-face, and Arrange via telephone call follow-up), for 12 weeks, with the experimental group also using a physical activity monitor. Outcomes include feasibility of recruitment, intervention, measurement, and blinding the outcome assessor, cost and clinical outcomes. DISCUSSION: The intervention aligns with stroke secondary prevention recommendations and utilizes low-cost telehealth approaches. This study will contribute to defining future RCT phases.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06068036.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.