ArticlePloS one2025
Growth faltering or deceleration toward target height: Linear growth interpretation using WHO growth standard 2006 for Indonesian children.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence of Childhood Stunting and Its Associated Factors in Bangladesh: Quantile Regression Modeling Approach.Journal of nutrition and metabolism · 2026Article
- Prediction models for stunting at 2-years-old from Indonesian newborn population.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWhen referred to the WHO Growth Standards 2006, children in many developing countries showed growth faltering in childhood. A previous study showed that the faltering affected the whole population, not only the disadvantaged ones. We aimed to look for an alternative explanation for this universal decline in length or height-for-age z-scores (HAZ), as lengths/ heights of Indonesian children were compared to the WHO growth standard 2006: Is it a faltering of growth or is it a deceleration toward target height.
methodsWe used data on age, gender, height, BMI, parental height and education, household socioeconomic status, and place of residence of children < 5 years old collected by the Indonesia Family Life Survey (IFLS) in 1993, 2000, 2007, and 2014. HAZ was calculated according to the WHO 2006 growth standard. Target heights were calculated from parental heights and converted to target height z-scores (THz). Discrepancies between the two values were used to show the children's growth patterns in relation to their target heights across ages.
resultsThe study included 11,241 parent-child pairs from four surveys. At birth, infants were around 1.50 z-scores longer than their THz. However, at two years of age, the discrepancies were almost zero. At 2-5 years old, the discrepancies stayed at the same level. The patterns were similar regardless of the position of the target heights among the height distribution, at the upper or the lower part.
conclusionWe observed a deceleration toward target height, not growth faltering, in the first two years of life of Indonesian children when the WHO Growth Standard 2006 was used as the reference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.