ArticlePLoS computational biology2025
TIPP3 and TIPP3-fast: Improved abundance profiling in metagenomics.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid phylogenomic analysis for viral surveillance and metagenomic profiling with Omni2Tree.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- TIPP-SD: A new method for species detection in microbiomes.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Strainify: Strain-Level Microbiome Profiling for Low-Coverage Short-Read Metagenomic Datasets.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present TIPP3 and TIPP3-fast, new tools for abundance profiling in metagenomic datasets. Like its predecessor, TIPP2, the TIPP3 pipeline uses a maximum likelihood approach to place reads into labeled taxonomies using marker genes, but it achieves superior accuracy to TIPP2 by enabling the use of much larger taxonomies through improved algorithmic techniques. We show that TIPP3 is generally more accurate than leading methods for abundance profiling in two important contexts: when reads come from genomes not already in a public database (i.e., novel genomes) and when reads contain sequencing errors. We also show that TIPP3-fast has slightly lower accuracy than TIPP3, but is also generally more accurate than other leading methods and uses a small fraction of TIPP3's runtime. Additionally, we highlight the potential benefits of restricting abundance profiling methods to those reads that map to marker genes (i.e., using a filtered marker-gene based analysis), which we show typically improves accuracy. TIPP3 is freely available at https://github.com/c5shen/TIPP3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.