Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40184365›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Findings from a qualitative analysis: Social media influencers of color as trusted messengers of HPV vaccination messages.

Amelia Burke-Garcia, Erin Cutroneo, Dasha Afanaseva, Kayla Madden, Angela Sustaita-Ruiz, Preethi Selvan, Estefany Rivera Sanchez, Amy Leader

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amelia Burke-GarciaPublic Health Research Department, NORC at the University of Chicago, Washington, DC, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0788-7770
Erin CutroneoPublic Health Research Department, NORC at the University of Chicago, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Dasha AfanasevaPublic Health Research Department, NORC at the University of Chicago, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Kayla MaddenDivision of Supportive Medicine, Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Angela Sustaita-RuizBrilla Media, North Bay Village, Florida, United States of America.
Preethi SelvanDivision of Population Science, Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Estefany Rivera SanchezPublic Health Research Department, NORC at the University of Chicago, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Amy LeaderDivision of Population Science, Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite HPV vaccination reducing the prevalence of cervical cancer by 90%, vaccination rates remain lower among communities of color due to vaccine hesitancy and mistrust in traditional public health messengers. The emergence of social media influencers, a newer kind of messenger, presents a unique opportunity to share immunization messages in new ways with a variety of communities. This paper reviews the qualitative findings from a study aimed at assessing influencers' perceptions of and approaches to sharing messaging about the HPV vaccine.

methodsGuided by several theories (Theory of Planned Behavior, Narrative Theory, and Opinion Leader Theory), the study team designed an intervention-based study consisting of qualitative interviews and social media influencer-designed and disseminated messaging. We worked closely with an influencer marketing firm to recruit 10 influencers of color who had children aged 9-14 - to write about the vaccine with their followers. Influencers used a provided factsheet to draft social media posts about vaccinating their children against HPV. Influencers were interviewed about their post and posts and interview transcripts were analyzed for key themes.

resultsMost influencers were hesitant to talk about vaccinations for fear of backlash. Most committed to writing, however, because they were compelled to support important health topics. All used the power of storytelling to convey the messages and highlighted their personal journeys of vaccine decision making. Influencers also highlighted the struggles of parenting and talked emotionally about how making decisions about this vaccine prompted feelings about their child growing up. Influencers also believed that they could help people make the decision to vaccinate.

conclusionsThe findings from this study elucidates the emotional context within which parents are being asked to vaccinate their children and thus, how personal the decision to vaccinate is. Most influencers noted that they had received a doctor's recommendation but were taking the time to do their own research. Insights from this study can help inform current and future public health communication programs aimed at supporting immunization efforts. It also can provide lessons for other health topics.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesSocial MediaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaccinationAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchTrustVaccination HesitancyPapillomavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID40184365
PMCPMC11970659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.