SynthesisFuture oncology (London, England)2025
Real-world avelumab first-line maintenance in advanced urothelial carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Future oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis systematic literature review summarizes the real-world effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of avelumab first-line maintenance (1LM) in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC). MATERIALS &
methodsDatabase searches (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane) and manual gray literature searches of real-world studies published from 01/01/2020-31/01/2024 were performed. Pooled 12-month overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were synthesized by meta-analysis.
resultsAcross 45 unique studies including >2,600 patients, median OS and PFS were 21.3 and 7.0 months, respectively. In the meta-analysis, 12-month OS and PFS rates (95% CI) from avelumab 1LM start were 69% (65-73%) and 39% (35-44%), respectively.
conclusionThis study supports the established clinical benefit of avelumab 1LM across a broad range of patients with la/mUC in routine practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.