ArticleGenomics, proteomics & bioinformatics2025
Cell-free DNA Fragmentomics Assay to Discriminate the Malignancy of Breast Nodules and Evaluate Treatment Response.
Article in Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cell-Free DNA Fragmentation Patterns as Biomarkers for Human Papillomavirus-Related Cancers: A Systematic Review of Methodological Diversity and Diagnostic Performance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- neomerDB: a comprehensive database of neomer biomarkers in cancer.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven multimodal fusion for precision diagnosis and personalized management of breast cancer.Oncology reviews · 2026Review
- Epidemiology, early detection, and management of breast cancer in China: A comprehensive review.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2025Article
- From multi-omics to deep learning: advances in cfDNA-based liquid biopsy for multi-cancer screening.Biomarker research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The fragmentomics-based cell-free DNA (cfDNA) assays have recently illustrated prominent abilities to identify various cancers from non-conditional healthy controls, while their accuracy for identifying early-stage cancers from benign lesions with inconclusive imaging results remains uncertain. Especially for breast cancer, current imaging-based screening methods suffer from high false positive rates for women with breast nodules, leading to unnecessary biopsies, which add to discomfort and healthcare burden. Here, we enrolled 613 female participants in this multi-center study and demonstrated that cfDNA fragmentomics (cfFrag) is a robust non-invasive biomarker for breast cancer using whole-genome sequencing. Among the multimodal cfFrag profiles, the fragment size ratio (FSR), fragment size distribution (FSD), and copy number variation (CNV) show more distinguishing ability than Griffin, motif breakpoint (MBP), and neomer. The cfFrag model using the optimal three fragmentomics features discriminated early-stage breast cancer from benign nodules, even at a low sequencing depth (3×). Notably, it demonstrated a specificity of 94.1% in asymptomatic healthy women at a 90% sensitivity for breast cancer. Moreover, we comprehensively showcased the clinical utility of the cfFrag model in predicting patient responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and its enhanced performance when combined with multimodal features, including radiological results [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.93-0.94] and cfDNA methylation features (AUC = 0.96).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.