Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40184223›Full record

ArticleGenomics, proteomics & bioinformatics2025

Cell-free DNA Fragmentomics Assay to Discriminate the Malignancy of Breast Nodules and Evaluate Treatment Response.

Jiaqi Liu, Yalun Li, Wanxiangfu Tang, Tianyi Qian, Lijun Dai, Ziqi Jia, Heng Cao, Chenghao Li, Yuchen Liu, Yansong Huang and 15 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. neomerDB: a comprehensive database of neomer biomarkers in cancer.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Epidemiology, early detection, and management of breast cancer in China: A comprehensive review.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Jiaqi LiuState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9775-2342
Yalun LiDepartment of Breast Surgery, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9055-1935
Wanxiangfu TangNanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc., Nanjing 210061, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9045-2478
Tianyi QianDepartment of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6532-7504
Lijun DaiOujiang Laboratory (Zhejiang Lab for Regenerative Medicine, Vision and Brain Health), Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China.ORCID 0009-0004-2079-9427
Ziqi JiaDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1480-9498
Heng CaoDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5985-3364
Chenghao LiOujiang Laboratory (Zhejiang Lab for Regenerative Medicine, Vision and Brain Health), Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2768-265X
Yuchen LiuDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2698-3482
Yansong HuangDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.ORCID 0009-0000-3149-3440
Jiang WuDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6374-3077
Dongxu MaDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5142-6667
Guangdong QiaoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai 264000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5298-3411
Hua BaoNanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc., Nanjing 210061, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5774-8755
Shuang ChangNanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc., Nanjing 210061, China.ORCID 0009-0003-0749-0372
Dongqin ZhuNanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc., Nanjing 210061, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8276-9109
Shanshan YangNanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc., Nanjing 210061, China.ORCID 0009-0005-0951-5179
Xuxiaochen WuNanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc., Nanjing 210061, China.ORCID 0009-0006-9529-871X
Xue WuNanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc., Nanjing 210061, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5567-1325
Hengyi XuState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5772-0661
Hongyan ChenState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4924-6100
Yang ShaoNanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc., Nanjing 210061, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4585-1792
Xiang WangDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1522-9532
Zhihua LiuState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4242-033X
Jianzhong SuOujiang Laboratory (Zhejiang Lab for Regenerative Medicine, Vision and Brain Health), Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1054-6042

Funding

Beijing Nova Program of Science and Technology 20220484059Biomedical Big Data Intelligent Computing Center of Oujiang LabCAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences 2021-I2M-1-014National Natural Science Foundation of China 82272938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fragmentomics-based cell-free DNA (cfDNA) assays have recently illustrated prominent abilities to identify various cancers from non-conditional healthy controls, while their accuracy for identifying early-stage cancers from benign lesions with inconclusive imaging results remains uncertain. Especially for breast cancer, current imaging-based screening methods suffer from high false positive rates for women with breast nodules, leading to unnecessary biopsies, which add to discomfort and healthcare burden. Here, we enrolled 613 female participants in this multi-center study and demonstrated that cfDNA fragmentomics (cfFrag) is a robust non-invasive biomarker for breast cancer using whole-genome sequencing. Among the multimodal cfFrag profiles, the fragment size ratio (FSR), fragment size distribution (FSD), and copy number variation (CNV) show more distinguishing ability than Griffin, motif breakpoint (MBP), and neomer. The cfFrag model using the optimal three fragmentomics features discriminated early-stage breast cancer from benign nodules, even at a low sequencing depth (3×). Notably, it demonstrated a specificity of 94.1% in asymptomatic healthy women at a 90% sensitivity for breast cancer. Moreover, we comprehensively showcased the clinical utility of the cfFrag model in predicting patient responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and its enhanced performance when combined with multimodal features, including radiological results [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.93-0.94] and cfDNA methylation features (AUC = 0.96).

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCell-Free Nucleic AcidsAdultAgedDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedWhole Genome SequencingBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsBreast cancerCell-free DNA fragmentomicsCell-free DNA methylationNeoadjuvant chemotherapyWhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID40184223
PMCPMC12321295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.