ReviewEpilepsia2025
Achieving epilepsy care for all: Ecosystem-based transformation.
Review in Epilepsia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Caregiver burden and associated factors among primary caregivers of children with epilepsy in southwestern Uganda.Epilepsy & behavior reports · 2026Article
- Vitexin Alleviates Kainic Acid-Induced Seizure Through Inhibiting P2X7R/NLRP3 Signaling Pathway.Inflammation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Epilepsy exemplifies many of the systemic challenges of modern health care-fragmented care delivery, inequitable access, financial strain, and so on. The current "system of systems" (SoS) structure of U.S. health care fosters siloed operations among its member systems (e.g., insurers, health care institutions, providers, researchers, pharmaceutical companies, and technology vendors), failing to address interconnected issues like care continuity, clinician burnout, and appropriate resource allocation. This article proposes embracing a health care ecosystem approach as a solution, emphasizing interdependence, collaboration, and equity. Section 1 examines the shortcomings of the current care model, with a focus on its financial challenges and the systemic inefficiencies it perpetuates. Section 2 explains the concept of a health care ecosystem and its potential to drive equity through organic coordination and collective accountability. It highlights the role of key member systems-patients, advocacy groups, professional organizations, health care providers, payers, purchasers, policymakers, researchers, and industry leaders-in achieving equity in brain health care. Finally, Section 3 presents a roadmap for transitioning from SoS to ecosystem, outlining multiple actionable strategies, such as enhancing advocacy and data sharing by professional organizations, adopting integrated and multidisciplinary care models by health care providers, and prioritizing affordability and collaboration by industry leaders. Policymakers and federal research organizations can support the transition by incentivizing collaboration, expanding funding for health services research, and supporting data-driven decision-making. Advocacy groups can amplify collective voices and help prioritize improvement opportunities. Using epilepsy care as an example condition, this article argues that coordinated, multi-sector, and multi-level efforts can successfully and efficiently address systemic challenges, improve outcomes, and reduce inequities. It offers a replicable framework for achieving sustainable, scalable, and equitable care for chronic neurological conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.