Observational studyMedicine2025
Red blood cell distribution width and platelet distribution width as a predictive marker in the diagnosis of malignant and benign causes of acute gastrointestinal bleeding.
Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The main aim of this study is to investigate complete blood count parameters in order to distinguish between benign and malignant causes of bleeding in patients who presented to the emergency department with gastrointestinal bleeding. In our study, we assessed 455 patients who were admitted to the emergency department between January 2022 and December 2023 with upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Patient's data were analyzed retrospectively. The diagnosis of malignancy was established following pathological investigation. The study investigated the relationship between benign and malignant causes and different components of the complete blood count, including white blood cells, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, red cell distribution width (RDW), platelet distribution width (PDW), mean platelet volume, platelets, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte-monocyte ratio, thrombocyte-lymphocyte ratio, RDW-platelet ratio, and mean platelet volume-platelet ratio. t test and Mann Whitney U test used for parametric and nonparametric scale values. cutoff points, sensitivity and specificity, and area under curve detected with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Of the 455 patients who applied to the emergency department, 382 (84%) had gastrointestinal bleeding due to benign causes, and 73 (16%) had malignant causes. RDW (P = .008) value was found to be significantly higher in bleeding due to malignant causes. The PDW (P = .017) value was significantly higher in bleeding associated with benign causes. No relationship was found between the other parameters. The ROC curve study revealed that the RDW had the highest diagnostic accuracy for predicting malignancy at a threshold of 14.1, and the area under the curve was 0.654 (95% CI: 0.578-0.729). The ROC curve analysis demonstrated that PDW exhibited the maximum diagnostic accuracy for predicting benign causes at a threshold of 13.8, with an area under the curve of 0.590 (95% CI: 0.502-0.678), showing moderate accuracy. The sensitivity and specificity of the RDW was 86% and 39%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the PDW was 63.95% and 58%, respectively. Our study has shown that the values of RDW and PDW can be valuable in predicting malignant and benign etiology in patients admitted to the emergency department with gastrointestinal bleeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.