ArticleMedicine2025
Assessment of occupational risks in nurses in Spain: Preliminary psychometric analysis of the ISTAS_Enfermería scale.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychosocial working conditions and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress among nurses: A cross-sectional study.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Article
- Psychosocial Risks in Spanish Nursing: Relationship With Stability and Working Conditions.International journal of public health · 2025Article
- Exploring Psychosocial Risk Factors Among Spanish Nurses: Links to Health and Professional Variables.Journal of nursing management · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To adapt and evaluate the psychometric properties of the SUSESO/ISTAS21 questionnaire for nurses in Spain. Cross-sectional study for the cross-cultural adjustment and psychometric validation of the COPSOQ-ISTAS21 scale. Descriptive analyses were conducted, and data was correlated. A confirmatory factor analysis was performed, thus assessing the reliability and criterion validity. The sample consisted of 2757 Spanish nurses. The exploratory factor analysis identified a 5-factor structure with 15 items, which explained 63.6% of the variance. The factors were named: Support at work; Job satisfaction; Work-related emotional well-being; Job insecurity; and Double presence. The internal consistency of the questionnaire, measured by Cronbach alpha and McDonald omega coefficient, was adequate, with values of 0.764 and 0.741, respectively. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis indicated a good model fit. Three levels of psychosocial risk (low, intermediate, and high) were identified based on percentiles and quartiles of mean scores. The adapted version of the SUSESO/ISTAS21 questionnaire showed reliable psychometric properties in Spanish nurses, making it a valid and robust tool for assessing psychosocial risks in this group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.