Observational studyMedicine2025
Recovery from inferior alveolar neurosensory changes after lower third molar extraction: A multicenter, retrospective study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Photobiomodulation for the management of inferior alveolar nerve paresthesia after implant surgery: A randomized clinical trial.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2026Trial
- Effect of intraoperative platelet-rich plasma on inferior alveolar nerve neurosensory outcomes after high-risk mandibular third molar extraction.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2026Article
- Article
- Neurosensory outcomes following permanent lingual nerve injury in surgical removal of mandibular third molars: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Saudi dental journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inferior alveolar (IA) neurosensory changes are complications that infrequently occur after third molar extraction. However, no adequate treatment has been established for IA neurosensory changes. The present study aimed to establish an effective treatment for IA neurosensory changes following lower third molar extraction. A total of 10,062 patients (12,776 teeth) who underwent lower third molar extractions were enrolled between April 2014 and June 2022. The medical records of the patients were reviewed, and relevant data were extracted. The prevalence of risk factors for recovery from IA neurosensory changes was analyzed. In total, 221 patients (224 teeth) developed IA neurosensory changes. Temporary and permanent IA neurosensory changes occurred in 1.75% and 0.71% of patients, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 6-month cumulative recovery rates were 25.0%, 60.1%, and 71.1%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that age < 40 years (hazard ratio [HR], 2.02; P < .001), local anesthesia (HR, 1.45; P = .03), and postoperative administration of corticosteroids (HR, 1.63; P = .04) were significantly associated with high recovery rates. The cumulative recovery rate significantly improved with corticosteroid administration (P = .04). However, no significant differences were observed using the propensity score matching method. No significant differences were observed with or without vitamin B12 administration. These results suggest that postoperative administration of corticosteroids enables recovery from IA neurosensory changes after third molar extraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.