Observational studyMedicine2025
Are YouTube videos on treatments for temporomandibular disorders reliable?: An observational study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Today, people frequently turn to the internet to seek information about temporomandibular joint disorders and treatments, as in all other health areas. However, does the information presented online without professional evaluation truly reflect the facts, and if so, to what extent? Based on this question, our study aims to evaluate YouTube™ videos on the treatment of temporomandibular joint diseases. In this cross-sectional study, a search was conducted on YouTube using the search term "TMJ (temporomandibular joint) treatment" for YouTube videos. One hundred sixty-three videos that met the study criteria were evaluated for content usefulness by 3 researchers. The videos were categorized as having low and high content according to usefulness score. All videos were classified according to the source and type of the videos. Statistical analysis were conducted using with Chi-Square test and Mann-Whitney U test. It was found that 130 videos had low content, while 33 videos had high content. It was observed that the number of views, duration in minutes, number of comments, number of likes, number of days since uploading and the rate of views were higher in videos with high content (P < .05). However, no significant association was found between the usefulness score and the source that uploaded the video and video type (P > .05). The results of our study reveal that the vast majority of videos on the treatment of temporomandibular diseases on YouTube contain insufficient information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.