Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40184035›Full record

ArticleGeobiology

Elevated δ

Christopher J Tino, Eva E Stüeken, Daniel D Gregory, Timothy W Lyons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geobiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christopher J TinoDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4686-3130
Eva E StüekenSchool of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, UK.
Daniel D GregoryDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Timothy W LyonsDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California, USA.

Funding

NASA 80NSSC19K1739NASA NNA15BB03ANatural Environment Research Council NE/V010824/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alkaline lakes are among the most bioproductive aquatic ecosystems on Earth. The factors that ultimately limit productivity in these systems can vary, but nitrogen (N) cycling in particular has been shown to be adversely affected by high salinity, evidently due to the inhibition of nitrifying bacteria (i.e., those that convert ammonic species to nitrogen oxides). The coastal plain of Coorong National Park in South Australia, which hosts several alkaline lakes along 130 km of coastline, provides an ideal natural laboratory for examining how fine-scale differences in the geochemistry of such environments can lead to broad variations in nitrogen cycling through time, as manifest in sedimentary δ

Indexed as

AmmoniaGeologic SedimentsLakesNitrificationNitrogen IsotopesHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationSalinitySouth AustraliaVolatilizationAmmoniaNitrogen Isotopes

Identifiers

PMID40184035
PMCPMC11970551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.