Trial reportSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2025
Patterns of adherence to continuous positive airway pressure and mandibular advancement splints in pregnant individuals with sleep-disordered breathing.
Trial report in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Treatment on Glycemic Control in Gestational Diabetes: A Pilot Randomized-Controlled Trial
Efficacy of Oral Appliances on Obstructive Sleep Apnea During Pregnancy
Effects of Positive Airway Pressure Treatment of Obstructive Sleep-disordered Breathing on Maternal and Fetal Outcomes in Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Actionable" risk for preterm birth: patterns and prediction in California singleton births 2016-2020.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Obstructive sleep apnea-associated hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: a literature review and clinical management strategies.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeNight-to-night adherence to sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) treatment with either continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or mandibular advancement splints (MAS) in pregnancy has not been well characterized. The objective of this study was to assess night-to-night adherence patterns from existing CPAP and MAS data in pregnancy.
methodsThree separate pregnancy cohorts evaluating treatment for SDB in the second and third trimester were used: 1) CPAP in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), 2) CPAP in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), and 3) mandibular advancement splints (MAS). The first 30 days of objective adherence data obtained from CPAP and MAS devices were used in this descriptive analysis.
resultsData from 37 CPAP users and 15 MAS users was analyzed. For the GDM and HDP cohorts, three patterns of adherence were observed: 1) consistent CPAP users (38%), 2) improved CPAP usage after initial adaptation (16%), and 3) inconsistent CPAP users (46%). For the MAS cohort, the three observed patterns of adherence were: 1) consistent MAS users (47%), 2) initial usage with subsequent decrease in adherence (20%), and 3) inconsistent MAS users (33%). Participant characteristics (demographics, disease severity) were similar between adherence groups, with the exception of longer total sleep time in consistent CPAP users of the GDM cohort and greater gestational age in consistent CPAP users of the HDP cohort.
conclusionOverall, objective night-to-night adherence patterns revealed that almost half of CPAP and MAS users had difficulty adapting to treatment in the first 30 days of treatment. Early usage patterns in pregnancy may provide insight into identifying patients who are at risk for poor adherence and for developing tailored and timely interventions to enhance adherence to therapy.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02245659, NCT03309826, NCT03138291.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40183988What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.