Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40183968›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025

Open-bigrams as orthographic processing units in Arabic: Evidence from the flanking-letters lexical-decision task.

Hicham Zeghli, Christophe Cauchi, Mostafa Bouanani, Bernard Lété

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hicham ZeghliFaculté des Lettres et des Sciences Humaines Dhar Elmehraz, Laboratoire SLLACHE, Université Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah, Fez, Morocco.
Christophe CauchiATILF CNRS & Université de Lorraine, 54001, Nancy, France.
Mostafa BouananiFaculté des Lettres et des Sciences Humaines Dhar Elmehraz, Laboratoire SLLACHE, Université Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah, Fez, Morocco.
Bernard LétéLaboratoire d'Études des Mécanismes Cognitifs, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon, France. bernard.lete@univ-lyon2.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using the "flanking-letters lexical decision" task, Dare and Shillcock The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 487-504, (2013) and Grainger et al. Acta Psychologica, 146, 35-40, (2014) demonstrated that word is facilitated when the flanking bigrams are present in the target word (e.g., RO ROCK CK), regardless of their position (e.g., CK ROCK RO), compared to different flanking bigrams (e.g., DA ROCK SH). This finding aligns with the Open Bigram Model proposed by Grainger and Van Heuven, (2004), which posits that orthographic representations in the Latin script are encoded by an unordered set of ordered letter bigrams. Employing the same task and experimental design, we replicated this key finding in Arabic. We observed a facilitative bigram-relatedness effect in both the repeated and the switched conditions. These results suggest that bigram coding reflects a universal orthographic mechanism, with letter bigrams functioning as representational units in Arabic, similar to their role in Latin scripts. Our findings also suggest that letter-position coding in Arabic may be more flexible than previously thought for Semitic scripts. We evaluate these conclusions within the framework of the Open Bigram Model and contrast them with the PONG model, which assumes absolute position coding.

Indexed as

Decision MakingLanguagePattern Recognition, VisualReadingAdultFemaleHumansMalePsycholinguisticsYoung AdultArabic orthographyFlankers taskOpen-bigram modelsOrthographic processing

Identifiers

PMID40183968
PMCPMC12058834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.