ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2025
Hypermetabolic pulmonary lesions detection and diagnosis based on PET/CT imaging and deep learning models.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Meta-Analysis of Deep-Learning-Based Fusion of Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography in Oncologic Imaging.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
- Deep integration of clinical metadata with [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Cascaded deep learning for automated lung cancer tumour burden quantification on [Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- PETWB-REP: A Multi-Cancer Whole-Body FDG PET/CT Dataset with Corresponding Radiology Reports.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Characteristics of pulmonary lymphoma on baselineQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to develop and evaluate deep learning models for the detection and classification of hypermetabolic lung lesions into four categories: benign, lung cancer, pulmonary lymphoma, and metastasis. These categories are defined by their pathological origin, clinical relevance, and therapeutic implications.
methodsA lesion localisation model was first developed using manually annotated PET/CT images. For classification, a multi-dimensional joint network was employed, incorporating both image patches and two-dimensional projections. Classification performance was quantified by metrics like accuracy, and compared to that of a radiomics model. Additionally, false-positive segmentations were manually reviewed and analysed for clinical evaluation.
resultsThe study retrospectively included 647 cases (409 males/238 females) over more than 8 years from five centres, divided into an internal dataset (426 cases from Shanghai Ruijin Hospital), an external test set I (151 cases from four other institutions), and an external test set II (70 cases from a new imaging device). The localisation model achieved detection rates of 81.19%, 75.48%, and 77.59% on the internal, external test set I, and external test set II, respectively. The classification model outperformed the radiomics approach, with area-under-curves of 88.4%, 80.7%, and 66.6%, respectively. Most false-positive segmentations were clinically acceptable, corresponding to suspicious lesions in adjacent regions, particularly lymph nodes.
conclusionDeep learning models based on PET/CT imaging can effectively detect, segment, and classify hypermetabolic lung lesions, and identify suspicious adjacent lesions. These results highlight the potential of artificial intelligence in clinical decision-making and lung disease diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.