ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2025
Leveraging machine learning with dynamic 18F-FDG PET/CT: integrating metabolic and flow features for lung cancer differential diagnosis.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Specific PET Imaging for Precision Management of Lung Cancer: Advances, Clinical Translation and Future Directions.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2026Review
- Surgery confers survival benefit in De Novo metastatic soft tissue sarcoma patients with low Ki67 or low total lesion glycolysis: a combined PET/CT and clinicopathological analysis.European radiology · 2026Article
- The optimal SVM model from multi-model comparison outperforms conventional criteria in preoperative prediction of ovarian cancer residual disease.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Article
- From imaging heterogeneity to clinical decision: a novel imaging biomarker based on bone marrow kinetics for advanced NSCLC patients in partial response.EJNMMI research · 2026Article
- The intersection of artificial intelligence and lung nodule research: current applications and future prospects.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Differences in the quantitative parameter of lung lesions in dynamic chest FDG PET/CT imaging: framing protocol, reconstruction algorithm, software processing.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- The value of metabolic parameters on dynamicFrontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- DCAI: a dual cross-attention integration framework for benign-malignant classification of pulmonary nodules.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDynamic 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT imaging has been shown to provide additional information for diagnosing lung cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate whether metabolic and flow features directly extracted from time activity curves (TACs) help differentiate between benign and malignant conditions of lung lesions.
methodsTACs at the primary lesion were extracted from each dynamic 18F-FDG PET/CT scan. The TAC signal was then decomposed into metabolism and blood flow components through kinetic modeling. Dynamic features including area under the curve (AUC), time-to-peak, and slopes were then extracted from each component. The extracted features from 187 patients (mean age, 60.41 ± 11.01 years; 117 males) were used to train a classification model based on bagging, a machine-learning method built with decision trees. The performance of the trained model on differentiating benign and malignant was tested using receiver operating characteristic analysis with cross-validation. External testing was then performed for an independent dataset that consisted of 42 dynamic scans. For the results, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used to assess the relative importance of the contributed features for individuals. Waterfall charts were also plotted, together with assessment of Cohen's effect size to demonstrate the superiority of the proposed model over SUVmax and the net FDG influx rate K
resultsThe combination of the multiple dynamic features was able to separate benign and malignant lesions. For cross-validation, the trained model had an AUC of 0.89, sensitivity of 0.80, and specificity of 0.88, which was significantly higher than that of either SUVmax (AUC = 0.79, DeLong p < 0.001) or K
conclusionAn explainable machine learning model that combines dynamic FDG metabolic and flow features can predict benign or malignant lung cancer patients more accurately than conventional parameters such as SUVmax or net influx rate K
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.