ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2025
Surgical Management of Humeral Avulsion of the Glenohumeral Ligament Injuries: Indications, Treatment Strategies, and Outcomes.
Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Humeral Avulsion of Glenohumeral Ligament Lesion - A Case Report and Surgical Considerations.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review aims to synthesize current knowledge on humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligament (HAGL) lesions, emphasizing clinical presentation, operative indications, and surgical outcomes. RECENT
findingsHAGL lesions play an important role in shoulder instability, occurring in 7.5%-9.4% of surgically treated cases, with a high propensity to cause recurrent instability if left untreated. The sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging for detecting HAGL lesions remains imperfect (50%- 83%), making arthroscopy the diagnostic gold-standard. Primary instability is the most common surgical indication (up to 82% of cases). Surgical repair, whether open or arthroscopic, yields excellent outcomes, with return to sport (RTS) rates of 81%- 100% and recurrent instability rates as low as 0%- 5.6%. Athletes may not always RTS at the same level (44%- 80%), however, and recurrent instability rates are higher in collision athletes (up to 21%). Limited data suggest a high incidence of recurrent instability in nonoperatively managed cases (up to 90%), although data on ideal indications for nonoperative management are lacking. HAGL lesions are an important yet often under-recognized cause of shoulder instability. Surgery is indicated in most cases due to its positive results, though comparative data between arthroscopic and open approaches are limited. Future research should refine imaging accuracy, directly compare arthroscopic versus open approaches, and enhance rehabilitation to improve pre-injury RTS rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.